Current Regulatory Requirements for Sterile Products
View: 268
Website http://bit.ly/12lscDf |
Edit Freely
Category FDA GXP Compliance;
Deadline: December 05, 2014 | Date: December 05, 2014
Venue/Country: Palo Alto, U.S.A
Updated: 2014-12-02 22:00:50 (GMT+9)
Call For Papers - CFP
This course will focus on current validation requirements for the manufacture of sterile products and the key areas of importance and audit focus. The instructor will suggest several industry best practices and review a checklist of process and procedures to ensure compliance to current requirements.Why Should You Attend:This webinar will highlight and summarize the following main components relating to current validation requirements for sterile products:Review of current regulations and guidance documentsTypical expectations when aseptic processing is involvedExpectations for protocols used to document the qualification of associated equipment, utilities and processesRecently cited regulatory deficienciesWho Will Benefit:This webinar will provide valuable assistance to all personnel in:QA/QCManufacturingEngineeringValidationRegulatoryInstructor Profile:Kenneth Christie has over 30 years of sterile manufacturing and regulatory GMP consulting experience in the areas of quality assurance and validation management in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. Mr. Christie is currently the chief operating officer for VTS Consultants, Inc., located in Amhesrt, MA. His responsibilities specifically include quality system auditing, GMP training, and serving as a subject matter expert for aseptic manufacturing processes, medical devices, APIs and solid dosage processing equipment, utilities, and systems on a global basis. Use coupon code 232082 and get 10% off on registration.
Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.