Sign for Notice Everyday    Sign Up| Sign In| Link| English|

Our Sponsors

    Receive Latest News

    Feedburner
    Share Us


    COMPLIANCE TRAINING ON 10 STEP RISK BASED APPROACH 2015 - 10-Step Risk Based Computer System Validation for SaaS/Cloud/Local Hosting

    View: 318

    Website http://bit.ly/1DY7ecf | Want to Edit it Edit Freely

    Category FDA Compliance;

    Deadline: March 03, 2015 | Date: March 03, 2015

    Venue/Country: Palo Alto, U.S.A

    Updated: 2015-02-27 13:23:15 (GMT+9)

    Call For Papers - CFP

    Understand the 10-step risk based approach to validation, explore methods to decrease resource requirements, and learn how to make documentation more manageable and understandable.

    Why Should You Attend:

    This webinar will explore proven techniques that reduce validation project time, often to one-third. Attendees will learn efficient documentation strategies for computer system validation and how to increase overall system productivity. The 10-step risk-based validation approach will be detailed so that the specific documents for a validation project are understood.

    Who Will Benefit:

    Computer system users

    IT personnel

    QA personnel

    Instructor Profile:

    Computer System Validation’s principal, David Nettleton, is an industry leader, author, and instructor on topics pertaining to 21 CFR Part 11, Annex 11, HIPAA, software validation, and computer system validation. His wide knowledge on these subjects comes from his involvement in the development, purchase, installation, operation, and maintenance of computerized systems used in FDA compliant applications.

    Use coupon code 232082 and get 10% off on registration.


    Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
    Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.