Sign for Notice Everyday    Sign Up| Sign In| Link| English|

Our Sponsors

    Receive Latest News

    Feedburner
    Share Us


    Webinar on Good Documentation Practices for GxP Compliance

    View: 222

    Website http://bit.ly/1Kf003R | Want to Edit it Edit Freely

    Category Good Documentation Practices; GxP Compliance; Online Compliance training

    Deadline: October 13, 2015 | Date: October 14, 2015

    Venue/Country: Fremont, U.S.A

    Updated: 2015-09-22 14:36:51 (GMT+9)

    Call For Papers - CFP

    Overview:

    Documentation is essential for good science. This is especially true in life sciences where FDA and other health authority regulations impose a special recordkeeping burden. In these industries, documentation serves both the scientific and compliance needs, and Good Documentation Practices (GDPs) are the set of activities that enable you to record your data and hand-written entries in a legible, traceable and reproducible manner.

    Why should you Attend:

    Whether you work in production or in a laboratory or if you conduct investigations or finalize product release, sound data and information is essential to success and compliance. To ensure success and avoid those frustrating, embarrassing discussions of missing or doubtful data, all employees must follow good documentation practices.

    The use of GDP allows companies to comply with regulatory requirements such as Good Laboratory Practices (GLP), Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) or the applicable quality management system (for example, ISO 13485, 21 CFR parts 11,211,312,and 820), or Good Clinical Practices (GCP).Documentation that is used in support of manufacturing, laboratory and clinical practices should adhere to GDP.

    According to the FDA, if it isn't written down, it didn't happen. As well, if it isn’t written down clearly, it didn’t happen either. Good Documentation Practices describe the required activities and steps to use when recording data and other handwritten entries. Personnel, who work with documentation must be informed of these requirements, recognize their significance to their job and be aware of the consequences of non-compliance.

    Areas Covered in the Session:

    Document System

    What is Documentation?

    Type of Documents

    Good Documentation Practices

    Good Documentation requirements

    Documentation Processing and Control

    Guidance documents for GDP

    Who Will Benefit:

    Anyone who authors, reviews, and audits documents and records in FDA-regulated pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device industries

    Clinical research associates

    Manufacturing/Production personnel

    Laboratory personnel

    Research and Development associates

    Document Control associates

    Batch record reviewers

    QA/QC specialists

    Validation engineers

    Quality Assurance auditors

    Regulatory Compliance Associates and Managers

    Speaker Profile:

    Alla Teresh ASQ CQA, has over 11 years of comprehensive experience in documentation audit and management within the medical device industry. During her practice, she designed and implemented a document control system for a startup company that was audited for and awarded an FDA medical PMA and 510K, CE Mark Approval for distribution in Europe. Her skills include a high level of proficiency in conducting technical reviews and managing quality system documentation.

    Contact Detail:

    NetZealous - Compliance4All,

    161 Mission Falls Lane, Suite 216,

    Fremont, CA 94539, USA.

    Phone: +1-800-447-9407

    Email: supportatcompliance4All.com

    http://www.compliance4all.com/

    Event Link : http://bit.ly/1Kf003R


    Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
    Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.