Sign for Notice Everyday    Sign Up| Sign In| Link| English|

Our Sponsors

    Receive Latest News

    Feedburner
    Share Us


    THE DCP AS A BLEND OF THE PROCESS FAILURE MODES AN 2016 - The Marriage of the PFMEA and Control Plan…A Dynamic Control Plan (DCP) - By Compliance Global Inc

    View: 347

    Website https://complianceglobal.us/product/700511/JdMarhevko/pfmea-and-a-dynamic-control-plan/1 | Want to Edit it Edit Freely

    Category Manufacturing,Quality

    Deadline: August 30, 2016 | Date: August 30, 2016

    Venue/Country: Online Training, U.S.A

    Updated: 2016-07-26 21:12:23 (GMT+9)

    Call For Papers - CFP

    Overview:

    The Dynamic Control Plan (DCP) is a blend of the Process Failure Modes Analysis (PFMEA) and Control Plan (CP) into one document! It entirely eliminates the need for a stand-alone Control Plan. By essentially “bolting on” a few columns to the PFMEA, the CP is more powerfully enabled to effectively prevent and/or detect the risk-analysis process that it is originally designed to manage.

    This little-used but AIAG approved format can reduce hundreds of hours of engineering/quality time in document preparation. It mitigates disconnects in the Corrective Action/Preventive Action (CA/PA) analysis process. Participants will review how to draft a model DCP from a provided sample. Attendees will be motivated with a plan of how to simultaneously reduce complexity while improving upon the efficiency and effectiveness of their quality management system.

    Why Should You Attend:

    Learn how to develop, manage and apply a DCP while reducing work content and improving upon process effectiveness. Minimize system risk by combining the PFMEA and CP into one effective format.

    Areas Covered in this Webinar:

    Process Failure Modes Effects Analysis (PFMEA): High level overview of PFMEA column content. Not designed to be an in-depth session of each PFMEA column

    Control Plan (CP): High level overview of CP column content. Not designed to be an in-depth session of each PFMEA column

    Dynamic Control Plan (DCP): Step by step blend of the two documents per general AIAG standards; no column will contextually be left behind. Participants will see how 2-3 lines of a DCP are modeled for simulated items including both variable and an attribute features

    Benefits Review: Participants will understand the pros/cons of the DCP format including:

    Pros: Some positives include reduced overall time in document management, reduced duplication of data collection, reduced risk of document alignment, Improved utilization in CA/PA analysis, etc

    Cons: Some cons that need to be managed include transitioning the “silos” of engineering and quality teams into one effective group and managing customer expectations of independent formats, etc.

    Learning Objectives:

    Reduce business complexity

    Increase effectivity of both the PFMEA and CP formats

    Mitigate system cross-referencing errors

    Increase risk-management thinking

    Who Will Benefit:

    Quality Professionals

    Engineering Professionals

    Manufacturing Professionals

    Lean Professionals

    For more information, please visit : https://complianceglobal.us/product/700511/JdMarhevko/pfmea-and-a-dynamic-control-plan/1

    Email: supportatcomplianceglobal.us

    Toll Free: +1-844-746-4244

    Tel: +1-516-900-5515

    Level:

    Intermediate

    Speaker Profile:

    Jd Marhevko is currently the VP of Quality, Lean and EHS for Accuride Corporation. Three (3) Accuride sites have won the prestigious Manufacturing Excellence Award (in 2014-2015). She has been involved in Operations and Lean/Six Sigma efforts for almost 30 years across a variety of industries. Jd is an ASQ Fellow. In 2016, Jd was awarded both the Shainin Medal and honored as one of the top 100 Women in Manufacturing by Washington DC’s Manufacturing Institute. With ASQ she also holds the CMQ/OE, CQE, CSSBB and is an ASQ Certified Trainer for a variety of Quality Tools. She is an MBB and has held various Baldrige Assessor roles. Jd is a Past-Chair of the ASQ Quality Management Division (QMD), a 25,000 member organization and supports several ASQ divisions in a variety of capacities. Jd is a Howard Jones awardee, the QMD’s highest honor. She holds a BSE from Oakland University in MI and an MSA from Central Michigan University.


    Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
    Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.