USP 1058 Analytical Instrument Qualification - 2017
View: 135
Website http://www.compliance4all.com/control/w_product/~product_id=501092LIVE?channel=mailer&camp=Webinar&A |
Edit Freely
Category Regulatory Affairs, education & training, education training, compliance edtraining, usp 1058, installation qualification, 2017 compliance trainings, fda quality management system, FDA Compliance Training, performance qualification, quality control
Deadline: April 18, 2017 | Date: April 19, 2017
Venue/Country: Fremont, U.S.A
Updated: 2017-02-24 19:00:50 (GMT+9)
Call For Papers - CFP
Overview: Analytical instruments should be qualified to demonstrate suitability for the intended use. Despite the fact that instrument qualification is nothing new and companies spend a lot of time, it is a frequently cited deviation in FDA inspectional observations and warning letters.Areas Covered in the Session:FDA and EU analytical instrument requirements Most common inspection problemsRecommendations for firmware and software validationRoles and responsibilities: QA, manufacturer, userQualification of existing systemsWho Will Benefit:Laboratory Managers and StaffAnalystsQA Managers and Personnel Regulatory AffairsTraining DepartmentsSpeaker Profile: Ludwig Huber Ph.D., is the director and editor of Labcompliance the global online resource for validation and compliance. He is the author of the books "Validation and Qualification in Analytical Laboratories" and "Validation of Computerized Analytical and Networked Systems, Informa Healthcare". He has given more than 300 presentations mainly on GLP/GMP, 21 CFR Part 11 and Validation around the world. For more information, please visit Dr. Huber’s website www.ludwig-huber.comContact Detail:Compliance4All DBA NetZealous,Phone: +1-800-447-9407Email: supportcompliance4All.com
Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.