Sign for Notice Everyday    Sign Up| Sign In| Link| English|

Our Sponsors

    Receive Latest News

    Feedburner
    Share Us


    How FDA Trains its Investigators to Review CAPA - 2017

    View: 115

    Website http://www.compliance4all.com/control/w_product/~product_id=501265LIVE?channel=mailer&camp=Webinar&A | Want to Edit it Edit Freely

    Category Capa System, Capa Quality, FDA Inspections, quality assurance, quality assurance manager, QA Management, regulatory affairs, regulatory affairs manager, regulatory affairs associate, death by capa manz

    Deadline: May 14, 2017 | Date: May 15, 2017

    Venue/Country: Online, U.S.A

    Updated: 2017-03-21 16:22:56 (GMT+9)

    Call For Papers - CFP

    Overview:

    In this session will be a section-by-section summary of the CAPA subsection of the QSIT, the document by which FDA inspectors operate during an inspection, as well as how your company can use that same document to increase the likelihood of a positive outcome during the inspection.

    Areas Covered in the Session:

    Documents Used by FDA Inspectors

    Investigations Operations Manual (IOM)

    CPG Manual 7382.845

    QSIT Manual

    Who Will Benefit:

    QA management

    CAPA coordinator

    Regulatory Affairs management

    Executive management

    Speaker Profile:

    Jeff Kasoff, RAC, is the Director of Quality at Byrne Medical, a leading manufacturer of endoscopy and colonoscopy devices, where he oversees the operation of the quality system. In this position, Jeff is responsible for oversight of the document control system, including maintenance of regulatory documentation.

    Contact Detail:

    Compliance4All DBA NetZealous,

    Phone: +1-800-447-9407

    Email: supportatcompliance4All.com


    Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
    Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.