Sign for Notice Everyday    Sign Up| Sign In| Link| English|

Our Sponsors

    Receive Latest News

    Feedburner
    Share Us


    STRUCTURING AND AUDITING PHYSICIAN EMPLOYMENT AGRE 2017 - Webinar on Structuring and Auditing Physician Employment Agreements: Key Stark Law Considerations by Joseph Wolfe

    View: 234

    Website http://www.mentorhealth.com/control/w_product/~product_id=800985LIVE?ourglocal.com_August_2017_SEO | Want to Edit it Edit Freely

    Category Internal audit process,structuring and auditing webinar,structure audit report,Best Practice Audit Reports,Employment Arrangements training,online healthcare training Webinar,Healthcare webinars,healthcare compliance webinars,online healthcare training

    Deadline: August 07, 2017 | Date: August 08, 2017

    Venue/Country: Fremont, U.S.A

    Updated: 2017-05-15 18:22:25 (GMT+9)

    Call For Papers - CFP

    Training Options Duration: 60 Minutes

    Tuesday, August 8, 2017 | 10:00 AM PDT | 01:00 PM EDT

    Overview: In this session Mr. Wolfe will provide an overview of the Stark Law,

    including its 2016 changes. He will also discuss best practices for negotiating and

    drafting employment agreements on behalf of health systems, hospitals, medical groups

    and physician practices. The webinar will focus on regulatory requirements, key

    provisions, valuation considerations and potential pitfalls that should be avoided.

    Why should you Attend: As health care organizations and physicians develop employment

    arrangements, they must manage their compliance and enterprise risk by ensuring the

    employment is defensible under the Stark Law. Prior to moving forward with any

    employment arrangement, the parties should carefully evaluate whether the proposed

    structure and financial terms support compliance with Stark's technical requirements

    and key tenets of defensibility so they will be prepared to mount a defense in the

    event the arrangement is ever challenged. This webinar will focus on the Stark Law's

    underlying technical requirements and key tenets of defensibility as they apply to

    physician employment arrangements.

    Areas Covered in the Session:

    Provide a general Stark Law overview

    Examine critical components of Stark compliant employment arrangements

    Discuss best practices for drafting employment agreements and the related financial

    terms

    Describe best practices for auditing employment agreements

    Review processes for documenting fair market value and commercial reasonableness

    Discuss best practices for auditing existing arrangements and potential pitfalls

    Who Will Benefit:

    In-House Counsel

    Health Care Compliance Officers

    Health Care Human Resources

    Health Care CFO's

    Health Care executives

    Speaker Profile

    Joseph Wolfe is an attorney with Hall, Render, Killian, Heath & Lyman, P.C., the

    largest health care focused law firm in the country. Mr. Wolfe provides advice and

    counsel to some of the nation's largest health systems, hospitals and medical groups

    on a variety of health care issues. He regularly counsels clients on a national basis

    regarding compliance-focused physician compensation and alignment strategies. He is a

    frequent speaker on issues related to the physician self-referral statute (Stark Law),

    hospital-physician transactions, physician compensation governance and health care

    valuation issues. Before attending law school at the University of Wisconsin, he

    served as a combat engineer in the United States Army.

    Price: $139.00

    Contact Info:

    Netzealous -MentorHealth

    Phone No: 1-800-385-1607

    Fax: 302-288-6884

    Email: supportatmentorhealth.com

    Website: http://www.mentorhealth.com/


    Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
    Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.