FDA-Regulated Environment Development Team - 2017
View: 142
Website http://www.compliance4all.com/control/w_product/~product_id=501361LIVE?channel=ourglocal_Jul_2017_SE |
Edit Freely
Category Business Analysts, Software, Medical Device Webinars, 21 CFR Part 11 compliance, clinical diagnostics, medical device engineering, medical imaging, medical-device fabrics manufacturing, contract lyophilization, clinical trial software
Deadline: July 12, 2017 | Date: July 13, 2017
Venue/Country: Online, U.S.A
Updated: 2017-05-16 20:27:24 (GMT+9)
Call For Papers - CFP
Overview: The Agile approach is well established in other industries adoption of Agile in medical device development has been increasing in the past five years.Why Should you attend:Medical device development struggles with huge pressures: the need for innovation, keeping cost down, and minimizing time to market. With all its success in other industries, it appears that the Agile approach be a huge should help - but even after years of use and multiple reports, criticism of, and doubts about, Agile methods exist in the medical device field.Areas Covered in the Session:Laying the GroundworkRecognize your contextWhat Agile solves - and requiresSelecting a project to pilotChange needs to be shepherdedWho Will Benefit:Software DevelopersBusiness AnalystsRequirements AnalystsProduct ManagersPortfolio ManagersSpeaker Profile:Brian Shoemaker consults for healthcare products companies on computer system validation, software quality assurance, and electronic records and signatures. He has conducted validation both on product software and on internal software, developed software quality systems, audited software quality processes (including agile methodology), and evaluated 21 CFR Part 11 compliance.Contact Detail:Compliance4All DBA NetZealous,Phone: +1-800-447-9407Email: supportcompliance4All.com
Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.