Sign for Notice Everyday    Sign Up| Sign In| Link| English|

Our Sponsors

    Receive Latest News

    Feedburner
    Share Us


    Scrutinizing Test Method Validation (TMV) to Verify the Performance of a Medical Device

    View: 228

    Website http://bit.ly/2qiWXEm | Want to Edit it Edit Freely

    Category bioanalytical method development;fda method validation

    Deadline: June 21, 2017 | Date: June 21, 2017

    Venue/Country: 2754 80th Avenue, New Hyde Park, NY 11040, U.S.A

    Updated: 2017-05-26 15:17:12 (GMT+9)

    Call For Papers - CFP

    Overview

    Test method validation is an often-confusing requirement for medical devices. A fundamental issue is the role-reversal between the test method and the product or process it is designed to detect. For example, while a defect-free process is desirable, a test method must be reliable both in detecting defects and in not rejecting acceptable samples. Those who work with process optimization and validation focus on optimizing a process and reducing variability. Those working on Test Method Validation, on the other hand, focus on discerning between process variation and measurement error from the test method itself.

    Often, the test method for a new process must be designed specifically for that process, and some of the pitfalls are in confounding the process itself with the test method. This webinar will present case-studies to explore how those issues are addressed.

    Why Should You Attend

    Although the FDA provides guidance on method validation, the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 21 Part 820: Quality System Regulation (QSR) 21 does not specifically broach the topic of method validation. It alludes to it in equipment qualification, statistical methods, process validation, design controls, and other sections. In numerous warning letters, we have witnessed significant importance of method validation as an applicable medical device validation activity. Although, some traditional methods have been applied to chemical, microbial and laboratory acceptance testing methods, they are generally less utilized in the medical device industry.

    Areas Covered in this Webinar

    Test Method Validation - Overview

    Quality System Regulation, 21 CFR Part 820, and ISO 13485 - Overview

    When should Methods be validated?

    Qualification vs. Validation

    Types of Test Method Validations

    How to perform successful test method validations

    How to ensure your inspection of verification is effective

    Detailing real-life case studies

    Understanding global reference standards for test method validation

    FDA requirements for TMV

    How to prove your inspection method is repeatable and reliable

    Recommendations: Some Best Practices and Strategies

    Learning Objectives

    This medical device process validation training will help you better understand Test Method Validations to verify the performance of a Medical Device, global reference standards, the FDA requirements and how to perform successful TMV to ensure your inspection of verification is effective, using detailed real-life case studies.

    Who Will Benefit

    Managers, Supervisors, Directors, and Vice-Presidents in the areas of:

    Research & Development

    Quality Engineers and Auditors

    Manufacturing Engineers

    Regulatory Affairs Teams

    Quality Assurance & Quality Control Teams

    Operations Teams

    Document Control

    Design Assurance Teams

    Device Development Teams

    Personnel involved in Verification and Validation planning, execution and documentation for devices

    For more detail please click on this below link:

    http://bit.ly/2qiWXEm

    Email: referralsatcomplianceglobal.us

    Toll Free: +1-844-746-4244

    Tel: +1-516-900-5515

    Fax: +1-516-900-5510


    Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
    Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.