THIS ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS TRAINING OFFERS PRACTICAL 2017 - Tools for Human Error Reduction -By AtoZ Compliance
View: 252
Website http://bit.ly/2qUkjE6 |
Edit Freely
Category fda 510k training, form fda 3632, fda gmp training, fda pre-approval inspection checklist, fda environmental monitoring, medical device quality system webinar, training fda medical devices, medical coding compliance plan, fda medical device training, capa system, fda guidance human factors, human error prevention, human factors fda guidance, human resources measurement and metrics, root cause analysis training
Deadline: June 13, 2017 | Date: June 13, 2017
Venue/Country: Online, U.S.A
Updated: 2017-05-29 20:23:03 (GMT+9)
Call For Papers - CFP
Key Take Away:This root cause analysis training offers practical approaches and tools to address human performance issues in GMP related environments by using a specific methodology to correct, prevent and avoid re-occurrence of these issues.Overview:Human error is known to be the major cause of quality and production losses in many industries. Although, it is unlikely that human error will ever be totally eliminated, many human performance problems can be prevented. Human errors start at the design stage. From procedures, training, and workplace environment many variables that affect human behavior CAN be manipulated reducing the likelihood of these occurrences.Why Should You Attend:To work with these challenges it is really important to understand human behavior and the psychology of error as well as understand exactly where the systems weaknesses are, so they can be improved and/or fixed.Areas Covered In This Webinar:Background on Human Error Phenomena and measurement. Importance of Human Error Prevention/reduction. Quantitative and qualitative information gathering. Why do we need tools for human error reduction programs?Training as a tool and human error.Facts about human error and training.Human Error as the Root Cause: what to do and how to measure it. ToolsPredictionRoot Cause AnalysisCognitive load assessmentSystems availableHuman error rateFloor checklistInterview questionsHuman error rates and other metricsTrending and trackingCAPA effectivenessMetrics and Human ErrorKPI’sHuman Error rate1st time pass rateOverall equipment effectiveness (OEE)Trending /TrackingLearning Objectives:Understand human error: factors and causes.Understand the importance: regulatory and business.Define the process to manage Human Error deviations.Learn about human error measurement.Learn about tools for measurement.Establish Key Performance Indicators. Define and measure human error rate, cognitive load, and CAPA effectivenessIdentify what I can do to support human reliability.Who Will Benefit:Training managers and coordinatorsOperationsManufacturingPlant engineeringQA/QC staffProcess excellence/improvement professionalsIndustrial/process engineersCompliance officersRegulatory/legislative affairs professionalsGeneral/corporate counselExecutive managementFor more information, please visit : http://bit.ly/2qUkjE6Email: supportatozcompliance.com Toll Free: +1- 844-414-1400Tel: +1-516-900-5509Speakers Profile:Ginette M. Collazo, Ph.DGinette Collazo, PH.D is a human error and human behavior expert. She has spent more than 15 years in technical training, organizational development and human reliability areas. She has worked with Bristol-Myers Squibb, Johnson & Johnson, Schering-Plough, Wyeth, and has been a consultant with major firms like Abbott, Johnson & Johnson, Perrigo, among many others. Also has implemented human error reduction programs and technology in many more small and mid-sized drug and device companies. An active researcher in specialized studies related to human reliability, she is the author of numerous publications on these topics.
Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.