How using such Sampling Plans Leads to Production
View: 126
Website http://www.compliance4all.com/control/w_product/~product_id=501623LIVE?channel=ourglocal_Dec_2017_SE |
Edit Freely
Category AQL Sampling Plans, aql sampling, Compliance trainings, sampling plans and techniques, sampling plan by attributes, sampling plan basics, Trainings for sampling plans
Deadline: December 11, 2017 | Date: December 12, 2017
Venue/Country: Fremont, U.S.A
Updated: 2017-10-31 15:50:05 (GMT+9)
Call For Papers - CFP
Overview:The pros and cons of the 2 most widely used sampling plans (ANSI Z1.4, and Squeglia's C=0) are examined in detail, focusing especially on the weaknesses of such plans in regards to meeting regulatory requirements.Why should you Attend:Almost all manufacturing companies spend time and money to inspect purchased parts upon receipt, in order to evaluate part quality before the parts Supplier is paid. "AQL" sampling plans are used almost universally for such inspections. However, AQL plans actually provide very little information about part quality. Areas Covered in the Session:Transformations to NormalityK-tablesNormal Probability PlotReliability PlottingWho Will Benefit:Process EngineerManufacturing EngineerQA/QC TechnicianManufacturing TechnicianR&D EngineerSpeaker Profile:John N. Zorich has spent 35 years in the medical device manufacturing industry; the first 20 years were as a "regular" employee in the areas of R&D, Manufacturing, QA/QC, and Regulatory; the last 15 years were as consultant in the areas of QA/QC and Statistics.Event Fee: One Dial-in One Attendee Price: US$150.00Contact Detail:Compliance4All DBA NetZealous,Phone: +1-800-447-9407Email: supportcompliance4All.com
Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.