ROLLING FORECASTS THE WAVE OF THE FUTURE 2018 - Rolling Forecasts the Wave of the Future, Data Based Budgeting vs. Driver Driven Forecasts!
View: 132
Website http://bit.ly/2sDjlyu |
Edit Freely
Category Tuesday, February 27, 2018 EST 13:00 Duration : 90 Minutes
Deadline: February 27, 2018 | Date: February 27, 2018
Venue/Country: 9106 Seven Locks Road, Bethesda, Maryland 20817 , U.S.A
Updated: 2018-02-21 18:14:25 (GMT+9)
Call For Papers - CFP
Description :Rolling Forecast contrasted with traditional budgeting as the wave of the future. Focus I on the impact of Key Business Drivers to the business. Establishing a forecasting process to cope with turbulent time. Includes the creation of Key Business Drivers. Sample formats and attendee exercises provided for start-up rolling forecast. Attendees take away a broad and basic understanding of the Rolling Forecasts, their benefits and how to migrate to Rolling Forecasts with simple tooks & Techniques.The current technology driven turbulent business environment present many challenges to business manager. One primary challenge is the ability to predict and plan for the future which is unexpectedly unpredictable. Changes are constant. Companies struggle to find ways to find manage resources and find ways to thrive and survive in this turbulent business environment.Traditional budgeting has been overtaken by these constantly changing events as is currently outdated and irrelevant for the following reasons:Too time consumingBased on assumptions that may not be validFocuses on past events not future possibilitiesCreates a “use it” or “lose it” mentalityRestricts creative thinking in resource management
Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.