Live Webinar Analytical Methods Validation for FDA Compliance
View: 245
Website https://worldcomplianceseminars.com/webinardetails/374 |
Edit Freely
Category
Deadline: April 23, 2018 | Date: April 23, 2018
Venue/Country: Online, U.S.A
Updated: 2018-04-17 21:15:12 (GMT+9)
Call For Papers - CFP
Live Webinar Analytical Methods Validation for FDA ComplianceTime: 12:00 PM EDT | 09:00 AM PDT | 11:00 AM CDT Duration 90 MinuteDescriptionUse of analytical methods is widespread. However, there are no formally accepted guideline or formats for the overall process of design, development, optimization & validation of analytical methodsMany analytical methods, lacking full and adequate validation have been introduced into the open literature and allowed to assume aura of authenticity but, they may never work or be useful with samples that are typically encounteredThis webinar will explain the validation of analytical procedures for determining the suitability of a given methodology for providing useful analytical data.Why should you attend -Method validation is the process of demonstrating that analytical procedures are suitable for their intended use and that they support the identity, strength, quality, purity and potency of the drug substances and drug or other products.In this webinar, you will learn:• Process to validate method• Components of method validation• Regulations USP / ICH / FDA• How we know what FDA is looking for• How to use Quality by Design (QbD) to enhance Analytical Method ValidationAreas Covered1) Method Development, Optimization and Validation Approaches2) Method Validation – High Level3) System Suitability4) Validation Componentsa) Accuracyb) Precisionc) Repeatabilityd) Interm. Prec.e) Specificityf) LODg) LOQh) Linearityi) Range5) LifeCycle Concept6) Validation Planning7) Method Validation Protocol8) Method Transfer & Revalidation9) European and International regulatory bodies and their guidelines on different aspects of Method Validation QA10) Quality by Designa) Lifecycle management of analytical procedures: development, validation and routine useb) Using principles of Quality by Design to get most robust methodsc) Defining validation parameters, acceptance criteria and test proceduresd) Templates and examples for efficient and consistent documentations11) How we know what FDA is looking fora) FDA Systems Based Inspection: Laboratory Systemb) FDA 483sc) FDA Warning LettersWho will Benefit• Anyone in a laboratory setting that needs to validate methods• Chemists (research and quality control personnel) involved in analytical method development, validation or transfer• Regulatory affairs/CMC personnel responsible for documenting analytical methods and their acceptability• Laboratory managers and staff• Analysts• QA/QCU managers and personnel• Training department• Documentation department• ConsultantsSpeaker ProfileAngela Bazigos.CEO of Touchstone Technologies Inc. She has 40 years of experience in the Life Sciences & Healthcare Industries. Experience combines Quality Assurance, Regulatory Compliance, Business Administration, Information Technology, Project Management, Clinical Lab Science, Microbiology, Food Safety, Turnarounds and Business Development. Past employers / clients include Roche, Novartis, Genentech & PriceWaterhouseCoopers. Positions include Chief Compliance Officer at Morf Media. Co-authored & prototyped 21 CFR 11 guidance with FDA. Co-authored Computerized Systems in Clinical Research w/ FDA. Patent on speeding up software compliance. Recently quoted in Wall Street Journal for using training to bring regulatory compliance to the Boardroom. National Trainer for Society of Quality Assurance.Price: $179 One Dial-in One Attendee | Corporate Live Recorded $279 One Dial In - Max 10 attendees |Group $695 Multiple locations upto 5 dial in | Recorded $249
Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.