Sign for Notice Everyday    Sign Up| Sign In| Link| English|

Our Sponsors

    Receive Latest News

    Feedburner
    Share Us


    Medical Device Employee Training - Requirements and Implementation Tips

    View: 218

    Website https://www.complianceonline.com/medical-device-employee-training-requirements-and-implementation-ti | Want to Edit it Edit Freely

    Category

    Deadline: February 27, 2019 | Date: February 27, 2019

    Venue/Country: U.S.A

    Updated: 2019-01-25 15:41:01 (GMT+9)

    Call For Papers - CFP

    Training is required by the FDA and ISO 13485, but determining training needs and tracking of training can be challenging, especially as companies grow. Improperly or inadequately trained employees lead to both product and process nonconformities. These can be costly, and potentially even a safety risk to users of your product, themselves or other employees. Most medical device companies are aware of this, and are generally good at specific job-related training, although often not good at documenting this training. From a regulatory perspective, training must be documented. From a company perspective, without properly assessing training needs, documenting actual training and making sure that training is effective, you may not be able to adequately assess if employees are being properly trained and to assure regulators that they are.

    This webinar will present specific FDA training requirements. It will focus on techniques for needs assessment and keeping records of in-house training and will also cover how experience and outside training can be integrated into this training. It will provide information and tips on best practices for assuring your employees are properly trained and you can demonstrate it.


    Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
    Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.