Data Integrity: Compliance with 21 CFR Part 11, SaaS-Cloud, EU GDPR
View: 13
Website https://www.compliancekey.us/upcoming-webinars |
Edit Freely
Category
Deadline: May 23, 2019 | Date: May 23, 2019
Venue/Country: Online, U.S.A
Updated: 2019-05-07 14:02:04 (GMT+9)
Call For Papers - CFP
OverviewThis webinar describes exactly what is required for compliance with Part 11 and the European equivalent Annex 11 for local, SaaS/Cloud hosted applications. It explains how to write a Data Privacy Statement for compliance with EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). What the regulations mean is described for all four primary compliance areas: SOPs, software features, infrastructure qualification, and validation. It gets you on the right track for using electronic records and signatures to greatly increase productivity and ensure compliance.Why should you attend this webinar?Our Speaker David Nettleton will explain:Which data and systems are subject to Part 11 and Annex 11How to write a Data Privacy StatementWhat the regulations mean, not just what they sayAvoid 483 and Warning LettersRequirements for local, SaaS, and cloud hostingUnderstand the current industry standard software features for security, data transfer, audit trails, and electronic signaturesHow to use electronic signatures, ensure data integrity, and protect intellectual propertySOPs required for the IT infrastructureProduct features to look for when purchasing COTS softwareReduce validation resources by using easy to understand fill-in-the-blank validation documentsAreas Covered in the Session:What 21 CFR Part 11 means todayPurpose of Part 11What does Part 11 mean?SOPsSystem featuresInfrastructure qualificationValidationSecurity standardsRolesUsernames and passwordsRestrictions and logsData transfer standardsDeleting dataEncryptionAudit trail standardsTypes of dataHigh risk systemsElectronic approval standardsElectronic signaturesSingle sign-onReplacing paper with electronic formsInfrastructure qualificationHow to efficiently document qualificationsValidationSoftware validation for vendorsComputer system validation for usersFill-in-the-blank templatesChange control re-validationSaaS/Cloud hostingResponsibilities for software vendor and hosting providerEvaluation criteriaHosting requirementsSOPsIT, QA, validationSoftware developmentAnnex 11EndComparison with Part 11EndWho can Benefit:GMP, GCP, GLP, regulatory professionalsQA/QCITAuditorsManagers and directorsSoftware vendors, hosting providersIndustries:PharmaceuticalMedical deviceBiologicFoodCosmeticsFDA Regulated CompaniesSoftware VendorsSaaS providersData centersIndustries:PharmaceuticalMedical deviceBiologicFoodCosmeticsFDA Regulated CompaniesSoftware VendorsSaaS providersData centersSpeaker Profile:David Nettleton is a keynote speaker of ComplianceKey. Computer System Validation's principal, David Nettleton is an industry leader, author, and teacher for 21 CFR Part 11, Annex 11, HIPAA, EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), software validation, and computer system validation. He is involved with the development, purchase, installation, operation, and maintenance of computerized systems used in FDA compliant applications. He has completed more than 280 mission critical laboratory, clinical, and manufacturing software implementation projects. His most popular book is Risk Based Software Validation - Ten Easy Steps, which provides fill-n-the-blank templates for completing a COTS software validation project.Register: https://www.compliancekey.us/webinarDetails?industryId=3&webinarid=1385&speakerid=249Contact Info:Compliance KeyEmail: supportcompliancekey.usVisit: https://www.compliancekey.us/upcoming-webinarPhone: +1 717-208-8666
Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.