Sign for Notice Everyday    Sign Up| Sign In| Link| English|

Our Sponsors

    Receive Latest News

    Feedburner
    Share Us


    AIED 2009 - Workshop Enabling creative learning design: how HCI, User Modelling and Human Factors help in 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education

    View: 2397

    Website http://www.aied2009.com | Want to Edit it Edit Freely

    Category AIED 2009

    Deadline: April 30, 2009 | Date: July 06, 2009

    Venue/Country: Brighton, U.K.

    Updated: 2010-06-04 19:32:22 (GMT+9)

    Call For Papers - CFP

    A Workshop held in conjunction with the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education

    July 6th - 10th 2009, Thistle Hotel, Brighton, UK

    http://www.aied2009.com

    Background and Motivation

    Although the term ¡°Learning Design¡± (LD) has been in use only in recent

    years, the earliest work in the field can be traced back to

    ¡°instructivist¡± approaches, which provided a clear instructional

    sequence for teachers to follow. The recognition of the need to make

    theoretical findings readily available to practitioners led to extensive

    work on Instructional Design Theory, which attempted to make learning

    theories more operational. However, the later focus on ¡°constructivist¡±

    theories of learning presented more of a challenge to an operational

    approach. The development of interest in ¡°Learning Design¡± as a focus of

    research began with the realisation that the constructivist pedagogical

    theories did not easily transfer to the practice of teaching. The

    emphasis on what learners were doing, and how to support their

    activities, was much less constrained by constructivism. This dependence

    on the context in which learning takes place required an approach to

    teaching based on design principles rather than pre-defined

    instructional sequences.

    There have been attempts to offer ¡°toolkits¡± or software to enable ease

    of entry into pedagogic design and support non-specialists in engaging

    with learning theories. Despite the effort, existing e-learning systems

    and authoring tools have several limitations in respect of support

    provided and usability, and cannot accommodate the needs of teachers who

    increasingly look for more intelligent services and support when

    designing instruction in order to avoid disorientation and develop a

    holistic understanding of how all the information fits together.

    Providing support by incorporating personalisation technologies into

    teachers¡¯ designs could be potentially helpful in formulating teaching

    goals and lesson plans and in better accommodating learners¡¯ needs. In

    fact, at present, systems do not provide tools for identifying patterns

    in effective learning design practice and offer no opportunities for

    teachers to personalise the learning experience and collaborate with

    peers in developing more effective designs. It also appears to be a

    large communication gap between authoring tools and learning systems,

    and teachers/learning designers. For example, teachers want to work with

    the terminology they are familiar with for describing their teaching and

    learning, which of course can create a problem for the exchange of

    learning designs using existing systems. Thus, the challenge for the

    next generation of Learning Design tools is thus to put the designer

    requirements and experiences at the centre of tool development. To this

    end, the Workshop will draw to the vast experience of HCI and user

    modeling and human factors research.

    Learning design is a creative process and tools are prescriptive and

    constraining and are often seen more as a hindrance. Thus, it is widely

    acknowledged that we need to do more to bridge the education/computer

    science divide and create a genuinely interdisciplinary basis for

    representing learning design, if we are to succeed in persuading

    teachers to work with this approach as the technical complexities

    involved are often not perceived by teachers as relevant to their needs.

    Moreover, it is important to offer teachers intelligent services, such

    as personalisation and content adaptation, matching learners'

    characteristics with specific learning designs, and exploiting

    teachers-directed feedback about the usefulness and appropriateness of

    learning objects or designs for certain learning scenarios. In this

    vein, the Workshop considers personalisation in the context of learning

    design as an important feature of the next generation of LD tools. This

    could be achieved by capturing the needs of each individual teacher or

    group of teachers and providing support for reaching a goal that

    efficiently and knowledgeably addresses individual or group needs.

    However, personalisation would not be achieved by prescribed sequences

    of actions and information but by creating a dynamic structure, e.g.

    based on ontologies, and more generally using user and community data so

    that the Learning Design tools can adapt to the users¡¯ knowledge,

    profiles and needs, and that users can consciously adapt the system to

    suit their articulated preferences. The Workshop will attempt to address

    the challenges discussed above. Furthermore, it aims to explore what

    teacher/learning designers-related information should be captured and

    how, and what kind of adaptations are needed to support teachers¡¯

    individual needs, goals and interests. It will also look at how users'

    interactions with designs and annotations of designs and the use of

    concepts from controlled vocabularies, taxonomies and ontologies can be

    captured in a user-friendly way and used to support the Learning Design

    process.

    The Workshop Content and Themes

    Technology enhanced learning, to be fully effective, requires a

    synthesis of insights from the learning sciences and Computer Science,

    in particular AI. Broadly speaking, the learning sciences provide deep

    insights into the learning design domain, while computing and

    particularly AI-based approaches provide formal representations,

    reasoning mechanisms and data structures that enable those insights to

    be captured in a precise and computationally executable form. There is a

    double challenge here, which is at the heart of a successful synthesis.

    This half-day Workshop aims to bring together education, HCI and AI

    experts to discuss and share ideas about the 21st century view on

    learning design, curriculum and AI-based technology to support the

    content design, creation, sharing, re-use, modification and learning

    that may occur when teaching. Contributions will include theoretical and

    applied research, and preliminary results on the following themes:

    • Creative Interfaces for creative Learning Design: Needs of the user

    and communities, barriers of use, usability and support through

    intelligent interfaces. How can research in HCI and intelligent user

    interfaces be used to facilitate the process of Learning Design? How can

    interaction analysis be used to improve Learning Design?

    • Human factor drivers for personalising the Learning Design experience:

    Personalisation, re-use, sharing designs from theory to practice to

    community. What are the human factors that influence the process of

    Learning Design? What community concepts can be exploited to enable

    creative Learning Design? What can AI do to capture and represent human

    factor considerations, patterns of behaviour and community knowledge for

    Learning Design? What AI-based knowledge representation and inference

    mechanisms are needed in personalised Learning Design tools? Can these

    AI-based mechanisms help to overcome the cognitive demands when using

    these tools?

    Workshop Topics

    Full and short papers that address one or more of the following topics

    are welcome

    • User experiences when designing a course using existing tools and

    identification of their limitations;

    • Context-aware design to support Learning Design;

    • Context-awareness as a design approach to aid building e-learning

    design tools; Can next generation AI reduce cognitive overload to

    enhance the usability?

    • User-centred design models for Learning Designs (user models,

    preferences, usage models, personalisation);

    • Human factors experience from the ¡°Learner Designer perspective¡±, e.g.

    users approach to design, users tool preferences, priorities, re-use of

    designs;

    • HCI design to overcome barriers of use;

    • Recommendation systems and personalisation for Learning Design:

    designing rule of thumb or heuristics, inference on ontological models,

    inference theory and architecture, nearest neighbour for ¡°concept¡±

    recommendation; Can they help with tool usage? How can pedagogical

    approaches be used in Learning Design to personalise the learning

    experience?

    • Drawing from research and experience from other applications to see

    how Education tools might benefit from AI.

    • Community-based and collaborative approaches. Does a community or

    collaborative approach ease the learning design task?

    • Intelligent interfaces to aid the creative process of Learning Design;

    • User modelling to assist Learning Design tools to enhance

    personalisation features.

    Submission Format and Procedure

    Full papers should not exceed 10 pages and short papers should be up to

    5 pages. Authors should follow the same template that is used for the

    main conference. All papers should be formatted according to IOS Press

    guidelines (formatting instructions are available on the IOS Press

    Authors Corner webpages at: www.iospress.nl/). Workshop papers will be

    published in full length in the workshop proceedings and presented

    orally at the Workshop. The papers will be printed locally for

    dissemination at the AIED Workshops and kept as a PDF file resource on

    the website. Please, submit your paper by e-mail to both Patricia

    Charlton (patriciaatdcs.bbk.ac.uk) and Kyparisia Papanikolaou

    (spapatdi.uoa.gr) by April 16, 2009. Portable Document Format (*.pdf) is

    preferred.

    Important Dates

    April 16, 2009: submission of papers

    May 20, 2009: notification of results

    End of May 2009: delivery of camera-ready paper

    Workshop Programme Committee

    Liliana Ardissono, University of Torino, Italy

    Stefano Cerri, University of Montpellier II, France

    Patricia Charlton, Birkbeck College, University of London, UK

    Brock Craft, Institute of Education, UK

    Ines Di Loreto, Dept of Informatics and Communication, University of

    Milan, Italy

    Maria Grigoriadou, University of Athens, Greece

    Jelena Jovanovic, University of Belgrade, Serbia

    Diana Laurillard, Institute of Education, UK

    George Magoulas, Birkbeck College, University of London, UK

    Alvaro Ortigosa, Universidad Aut¨®nonoma de Madrid. Spain

    Kyparisia Papanikolaou, School of Pedagogical and Technological

    Education, Athens, Greece

    Barbara Schmidt-Belz, Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information

    Technology, Germany

    Martin Wolpers, Fraunhofer-Institut f¨?r Angewandte Informationstechnik

    FIT,Germany

    Workshop Organisation

    Patricia Charlton, Birkbeck College, University of London, UK

    Maria Grigoriadou, University of Athens, Greece

    Diana Laurillard, Institute of Education, UK

    George Magoulas, Birkbeck College, University of London, UK

    Kyparisia Papanikolaou, School of Pedagogical and Technological

    Education, Athens, Greece

    Contact Person

    For any questions regarding the Workshop, please email George Magoulas

    (gmagoulasatdcs.bbk.ac.uk)


    Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
    Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.