Sign for Notice Everyday    注册| 登陆| 友情链接| English|

Our Sponsors


    Guidelines for New FDA Transfer of Analytical Methods - 2017

    View: 136

    Website http://www.compliance4all.com/control/w_product/~product_id=501277LIVE?channel=mailer&camp=Webinar&A | Want to Edit it Edit Freely

    Category FDA, Drug Administration, Analytical Methods, FDA Warning Letters, Guidelines, Masterplan, laboratory research, warning letter, form 483, warning letter to employee, Consultants, FDA Compliance Training

    Deadline: May 17, 2017 | Date: May 18, 2017

    Venue/Country: Online, U.S.A

    Updated: 2017-03-21 16:25:48 (GMT+9)

    Call For Papers - CFP

    Overview:

    When validated methods are transferred between laboratories and sites, their validated state should be maintained to ensure the same reliable results in the receiving laboratory. For a long time there was no official guidance on what exactly is expected to maintain 'the validated state'.

    Areas Covered in the Session:

    Four approaches for analytical method transfer and testing

    Responsibilities of the transferring and receiving laboratory

    Developing a transfer plan and a pre-approval protocol

    Who Will Benefit:

    Analysts

    Lab Supervisors and Managers

    QA Managers and Personnel

    Consultants

    Teachers

    Speaker Profile:

    Ludwig Huber Ph.D., is the director and editor of Labcompliance the global online resource for validation and compliance. He is the author of the books "Validation and Qualification in Analytical Laboratories" and "Validation of Computerized Analytical and Networked Systems, Informa Healthcare".

    Contact Detail:

    Compliance4All DBA NetZealous,

    Phone: +1-800-447-9407

    Email: supportatcompliance4All.com


    Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
    Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.