Laboratory Accreditation -Getting There is Just the Beginning - 2017
View: 138
Website http://www.compliance4all.com/control/w_product/~product_id=501353LIVE?channel=ourglocal_Jul_2017_SE |
Edit Freely
Category Laboratory Accreditation, Quality Assurance Webinars, Laboratory Technicians, iso 17025 accreditation, iso 17025 standard, iso accreditation, management professionals, compliance online training, laboratory accreditation program
Deadline: July 17, 2017 | Date: July 18, 2017
Venue/Country: Online, U.S.A
Updated: 2017-05-16 20:29:08 (GMT+9)
Call For Papers - CFP
Overview: Accreditation is not a guarantee of analytical competency. Getting accredited is just the beginning. The journey begins with defining the laboratory's operating principals and policies. Why should you Attend:Many laboratories struggle with developing and implementing a functional quality management system that not only complies with the management and technical requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2005 but also meets their needs. Areas Covered in the Session:Defining a Quality Management System (QMS)Management Components of a QMSTechnical Components of a QMSMethod Selection, Validation and VerificationEnsuring analytical competencyWho Will Benefit:Laboratory owners and operatorsLaboratory ManagersQA ManagersQC AnalystsLaboratory TechniciansSpeaker Profile:Michael Brodsky has been an Environmental Microbiologist for more than 41 years. He is a Past President of the Ontario Food Protection Association and AOAC International. He serves as Chair for the AOAC Expert Review Committee for Microbiology.Contact Detail:Compliance4All DBA NetZealous,Phone: +1-800-447-9407Email: supportcompliance4All.com
Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.