483 Covers a Broad Gradation of Problems
View: 147
Website http://www.compliance4all.com/control/w_product/~product_id=501516LIVE?channel=ourglocal_Oct_2017_SE |
Edit Freely
Category Manufacturers, FDA Consultants, Legal Counsel
Deadline: August 24, 2017 | Date: August 25, 2017
Venue/Country: Fremont, U.S.A
Updated: 2017-08-18 16:30:07 (GMT+9)
Call For Papers - CFP
Overview:How you respond to the 483 should provide the foundation for any future communication with the FDA about a particular inspection. Understanding how FDA organizes its evaluation of the 483 can facilitate the FDA’s review in your favor as it is well organized, succinct and provides proper documentation. Why You Should Attend:Your failure to understand and properly respond to a 483 issued to you at the conclusion of an FDA inspection may quickly lead to an administrative or a legal action that can have an immediate adverse effect on a firm’s business.Areas Covered in the Session:What the 483 meansHow to interpret the 483 - "How bad is it?"Managing the 483 discussion with the FDA at the conclusion of the inspectionResponding to the FDA in writing Who Will Benefit:ManufacturersFDA ConsultantsLegal CounselRegulatory Affairs ManagersQuality Assurance StaffSpeaker Profile:Casper (Cap) Uldriks, through his firm “Encore Insight LLC,” brings over 32 years of experience from the FDA. He specialized in the FDA’s medical device program as a field investigator, served as a senior manager in the Office of Compliance and an Associate Center Director for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health.Contact Detail:Compliance4All DBA NetZealous,Phone: +1-800-447-9407Email: supportcompliance4All.com
Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.