Sign for Notice Everyday    Sign Up| Sign In| Link| English|

Our Sponsors

    Receive Latest News

    Feedburner
    Share Us


    Tactical Problem Solving: Maximize Organizational Effectiveness, Efficiency, Reliability and Profit

    View: 138

    Website http://bit.ly/2BeVms4 | Want to Edit it Edit Freely

    Category Financial Predictive Modelling; Process Reliability Modelling;Tactical Problem Solving

    Deadline: March 06, 2018 | Date: March 06, 2018

    Venue/Country: Training Doyens 26468 E Walker Dr,Aurora, Colora, U.S.A

    Updated: 2018-02-07 17:48:10 (GMT+9)

    Call For Papers - CFP

    OVERVIEW

    Tactical Problem Solving is an analytical approach used to identify and solve problems. Analysis is presented in the Seven Basic Tools of Quality in addition to advanced methods used to increase organizations effectiveness, efficiency andreliability.

    WHY SHOULD YOU ATTEND

    Traditional methods of Process Improvement demonstrate high failure rates: Business Process Reengineering (BPR) 50% to 85%, Total Quality Management (TQM) 75% and Six Sigma 90%

    Proactive methods used in Process Reliability Modeling (PRM) will identify organizational issues before they result in loss of revenue.

    AREAS COVERED

    Cause and Effect diagrams (Fishbone or Ishikawa Diagram)

    The Ishikawa Fishbone Diagram (IFD) is a tool used to identify and present possible root causes to a problem. IFD was created by Dr. Kaoru Ishikawa; his method was popularized in early 1960s and used in the Kawasaki shipyards.

    Check Sheets

    A simple document created to collect data in real time. Data may be used to determine process capability and issues needing attention.

    Control Charts

    A graph used to study process variation over time. Data plotted includes individual process readings, Upper and Lower Control Limits.

    Histogram

    A special type of bar graph that shows the ‘shape’ of data in pictorial form. Shape includes symmetry and skewness.

    Pareto Chart

    The most common chart used by management; the Pareto is an ordered histogram that displays defects in order of frequency.

    Scatter Diagram

    Presents a visual picture of data usually two variables to determine correlation between variables.

    Stratification Chart

    A method used to separate masses of data into patterns we can see and understand.

    Process Reliability Modeling

    Process Reliability Modeling (PRM) is a very sensitive measurement instrument used to identify areas of transactional or manufacturing processes contributing to loss of revenue and customer dissatisfaction. PRM is suited for any industry or service including medical processes.

    PRM has its roots in reliability engineering. Through employee surveys qualitative information is converted into quantitative data to determine the likelihood of passing work through the entire organization error free. Processes with a low reliability score are flagged and root cause failure analysis methods engaged.

    Failure Mode Effects Analysis (FMEA)

    A step by step approach for identifying and resolving process problems effecting organization effectiveness, efficiency, reliability and safety.

    Value Stream Mapping

    Method used to document, analyze and improve the flow of information or materials required to produce a product or service for a customer.

    Hypothesis Testing

    Test theories by comparing before and after data to determine if change is significant and an improvement.

    LEARNING OBJECTIVES

    Specific areas presented:

    Cause and Effect diagrams (Fishbone or Ishikawa Diagram)

    Check Sheets

    Control Charts

    Histogram

    Pareto Chart

    Scatter Diagram

    Flow Chart (Stratification or Run Chart)

    Advanced topics:

    Process Reliability Modeling (PRM)

    Failure Mode Effects Analysis (FMEA and FMECA)

    Value Stream Mapping

    Hypothesis Testing

    WHO WILL BENEFIT

    This training is useful for all the individuals who want to learn process variation countermeasures. It would be ideal for:

    Senior executives

    Strategic leaders

    Quality Managers

    Product managers

    Manufacturing and R&D Managers

    Quality Professionals/Consultants

    ISO Coordinators/Management Representatives

    Engineers and Supervisors

    Laboratory quality professionals

    SPEAKER

    Dr. Michael Abitz is an Adjunct Professor at New Mexico Jr. College, Hobbs, NM. He received his Doctorate in Management from Colorado Technical University and Master of Science in Quality Assurance from California State University. He is a certified Six Sigma Quality Black Belt.

    His areas of interest include teaching online; providing training to pacific rim suppliers in accelerated life testing of communications, computer and digital storage products; mentoring organizations in problem solving and process improvement; and to date cost savings include $15.6M in addition to $14M in sales.

    Dr. Abitz's experiences include: aerospace and computer industries where he developed and presented training in: Organizational Process Improvement, Six Sigma (35 classes) and Root Cause Failure Analysis to U.S. companies and Pacific Rim suppliers

    For more details click on this link:

    http://bit.ly/2BeVms4

    You may also refer to this link:

    https://www.trainingdoyens.com/product/50084-export-import-business-training

    https://www.trainingdoyens.com/product/50087-learn-query-access-from-excel

    https://www.trainingdoyens.com/product/50132-using-linkedin-for-business

    Ticket Price:

    Live Webinar : $199

    Recorded Webinar : $219

    Training DVD or USB Flash Drive : $399

    Super Combo Offer 1 : $329

    Super Combo Offer 2 : $499


    Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
    Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.