Sign for Notice Everyday    Sign Up| Sign In| Link|

Our Sponsors

  • ESTA - Electronic System for Travel Authorization
Receive Latest News

Feedburner
Share Us

National Practitioner Data Bank Expanded Reporting Parameters

View: 23

Website http://www.mentorhealth.com/control/w_product/~product_id=801362LIVE?ourglocal_aug_2018_SEO | Edit Freely

Category npdb reporting,national physician database,npdb reporting requirements,cross sectional analysis,national practitioner data bank guidebook,national practitioner,physicians national bank

Deadline: August 27, 2018 | Date: August 28, 2018

Venue/Country: Online, U.S.A

Updated: 2018-07-12 18:07:03 (GMT+9)

Call For Papers - CFP

Training Options Duration: 60 Minutes

Wednesday, August 29, 2018 | 10:00 AM PDT | 01:00 PM EDT

Overview: Hospitals must file a National Practitioner Data Bank report on any physician's

surrender of privileges if an investigation is underway. This has always been a Data Bank

reporting requirement, intended to discourage plea bargains which allowed physicians to avoid

being reported if they agreed to waive hearing rights.

Under the new Guidebook, expanded descriptions of "investigation" and "surrender" stretch what

is to be considered a reportable surrender of privileges.

OPPE and FPPE and other peer review can be affected, as are physicians ability to make practice

decisions without inadvertently tripping Data Bank reporting triggers. Medical staff bylaws and

policies need to be reworked under the new Data Bank Guidebook.

Why should you Attend: Are you aware of the revisions to the National Practitioner Data Bank

Guidebook? New and surprising government interpretations of the regulatory scheme have been

recently published. Most medical staff policies and bylaws in hospitals today do not reflect

these changes. Legal protections for medical staff leaders and hospitals could be lost.

Physicians will be surprised by reports generated under the new Guidebook.

Areas Covered in the Session:

National Practitioner Data Bank Guidebook changes

Hospital reporting requirements

Medical staff bylaws problems

Peer review process issues

Physician credentialing

Who Will Benefit:

Medical Staff President/Chief of Staff

Bylaws Committee

Credentialing Committee

Chief Medical Officer

Vice President of Medical Affairs

Chief of Staff

Director of Medical Staff

Medical Staff Attorney

Hospital Counsel

Medical Staff Manager

Credentialing Specialist

Human Resources Professionals

Speaker Profile

Elizabeth Snelson works for medical staffs and medical societies across the country. Medical

staff bylaws are a primary focus of her practice. She also handles "disruptive practitioner"

procedures, peer review problems, and other compliance matters.

A frequent speaker on medical staff legal issues, Elizabeth Snelson presents at medical staff

leadership retreats and serves as an expert witness in credentialing and Data Bank cases. She

is Past President of the American Society of Medical Association Counsel, and past Vice

President of the ABA’s Physician Issues Interest Group. She was a member of the Joint

Commission’s Task Force on medical staff bylaws. Her articles on medical staff legal issues

have appeared in various publications. She is the author of The Physicians’ Guide to Medical

Staff Organization Bylaws, published by the American Medical Association.

Price - $139

Contact Info:

Netzealous LLC - MentorHealth

Phone No: 1-800-385-1607

Fax: 302-288-6884

Email: support@mentorhealth.com

Website: http://www.mentorhealth.com/

Webinar Sponsorship: https://www.mentorhealth.com/control/webinar-sponsorship/

Follow us on : https://www.facebook.com/MentorHealth1

Follow us on : https://www.linkedin.com/company/mentorhealth/

Follow us on : https://twitter.com/MentorHealth1


Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.