Sign for Notice Everyday    注册| 登陆| 友情链接| English|

Our Sponsors


    MEDICAL DEVICES 2011 - Verification vs. Validation in Regulated Industries

    View: 716

    Website http://complianceonline.com/ecommerce/control/trainingFocus/~product_id=700828?channel=ourglocal | Want to Edit it Edit Freely

    Category Medical Devices,conference,event,Webinar

    Deadline: April 05, 2011 | Date: April 05, 2011

    Venue/Country: Palo Alto, U.S.A

    Updated: 2011-03-11 18:46:17 (GMT+9)

    Call For Papers - CFP

    Why Should You Attend:

    Companies wishing to understand the risks and complications involved with the application of sound verification and validation principles will gain a better understanding of the differences and benefits by attending this training.

    The meanings and regulatory requirements of the terms “verification” and “validation” are often confusing to engineers and even some regulatory professionals. FDA regulations as well as European standards such as ISO 13485:2003 require both verification & validation documentation throughout these regulations and standards.

    The terms apply to design control, process control and others. Verification and validation also appear in the “essential requirements” in MDD 93/42/EEC needed for CE marking medical devices in the European Union. Good engineering practices in all industries benefit from well executed verification and validation studies.

    Areas Covered in the Seminar:

    Verification & validation types.

    Definitions.

    Design control.

    Process control.

    Application.

    Consequences of poor verification & validation.

    Why verification & validation makes good business sense?

    NOTE: Use This Promocode ( 117660 ) To Get 10% Discount.


    Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
    Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.