QUALITY MANAGEMENT 2011 - Understanding the ISO 9001, 14001 and OHSAS 18001 Process
View: 510
Website http://complianceonline.com/ecommerce/control/trainingFocus/~product_id=701925?channel=ourglocal |
Edit Freely
Category Quality Management ,compliance webinar,event,conference
Deadline: March 25, 2011 | Date: March 25, 2011
Venue/Country: Palo Alto, U.S.A
Updated: 2011-03-14 17:58:18 (GMT+9)
Call For Papers - CFP
Why Should You Attend:Effective implementation of the international management systems can bring great rewards in identifying inefficiencies in your day-to-day operations. And this directly translates to cost savings.Are you getting the value added to each registration auditor visit or is it the same review of documents and auditors hiding in conference rooms?Many organizations are not taking full advantage of these international management systems, mainly financial opportunities. This webinar is a way to discuss implementation problems, registration problems, interpretation of the standards, selling management on a management system, all with the anonymity of a web cast.Use this webinar as a forum to hear what others are thinking and share in the give and take of what works and what doesn’t work for you.Areas Covered in the Seminar:Questions regarding interpretation of ISO 9001, 14001 and OHSAS 18001.Q&A on your specific issues.Real world examples of what works and what doesn’t work.Dealing with registrars.Looking at process management and uncovering waste.These are Business Management Systems…what does that mean?Auditing made simple.How certifications in developing nations are impacting competition.Where do you start if you are interested in implementing a Business Management System.NOTE: Use This Promocode ( 117660 ) To Get 10% Discount.
Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.