CONAS 2012 - WORKSHOP ON COGNITIVE DYNAMICS IN NEURAL SYSTEMS: MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTATIONAL MODELING
View: 2171
Website |
Edit Freely
Category CONAS 2012
Deadline: October 31, 2011 | Date: March 29, 2012-March 30, 2012
Venue/Country: Lyon, France
Updated: 2011-12-07 12:42:03 (GMT+9)
Call For Papers - CFP
Nonlinear Dynamics in Complex Neural Architectureshttp://conas2012.elis.ugent.be/
A two-day open workshop in Lyon, France, March 29 & 30, 2012Animals are proof that complete cognitive systems can be realized inneural substrates. It is thus natural that engineers from AI andmachine learning have tried to design advanced cognitive systems onthe basis of artificial neural networks. This has led to illuminatingconcepts and architectures in fields like computational linguistics,dynamic pattern recognition, autonomous agents, or evolutionaryrobotics. However, if one takes a close and critical look, one findsthat nowhere do artificial systems close to biologicallevels of performance. One important cause for this gap is a lack ofappropriate mathematical concepts. Biological neural systems arehigh-dimensional, nonlinear, heterogeneous, multiscale, nonstationary,stochastic, and heavily input-driven - a cocktail of properties whichoverwhelms current dynamical systems theory. Inasmuch as we do notpossess mathematical models for such systems, we cannot understandthem; and inasmuch as we do not understand, we cannot engineer.This workshop will bring together researchers from three fields:1. cognitive scientists, roboticists and machine learning engineerswho develop complex, neural-network-based architectures;2. computational neuroscientists who apply existing methods fromdynamical systems theory to neural dynamics;3. mathematicians who work on extensions of dynamical systems theoryin directions that appear relevant for neurodynamics and complexneural learning architectures.Invited speakers:* Randall D. Beer, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA: Information and Dynamics in Brain-Body-Environment Systems* Chris Eliasmith, Univ. of Waterloo, Canada: How to Build a Brain: From Single Neurons to a Cognitive Architecture* Olivier Fauguras, INRIA Sophia-Antipolis, France: Neural fields in Action: Mathematical Results and Models of Visual Perception* Tomas Gedeon, Montana State University, Bozeman, USA: Correspondence Maximization: a Potential Model for the Function of Multi-Layer Neural Architectures* Juergen Jost, Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig, Germany: Information Theory, Nonlinear Dynamics, and Recurrent Neural Processing* Christian Poetzsche, Alpen-Adria Univ. Klagenfurt, Austria: Nonautonomous Dynamics - A Biased Survey* Gregor Schoener, Univ. of Bochum, Germany: Dynamic Field Theory as a Framework for Understanding Embodied Cognition* Jun Tani, Riken Brain Science Institute, Saitama, Japan: Neuro-Dynamic Mechanisms for Predicting and Recognizing Compositional Acts* Jochen Triesch, Frankfurt Institute of Advanced Studies, Frankfurt, Germany: Self-organization Explains the Statistics and Dynamics of Synaptic Connection Strengths in CortexFormat of workshop in a nutshell: invited presentations (see above) only, much time for disussion in plenum and breaks, extended poster session particularly aimed at young researchers and/or themes fostering discussion.The workshop is funded through the European FP7 project Organic (http://organic.elis.ugent.be/
).For details and further background see website http://conas2012.elis.ugent.be/
.Program board:Herbert Jaeger, Jacobs University Bremen, Germany (co-chair)Peter F. Dominey, INSERM Lyon, France (co-chair)Wolfgang Maass, Technical University Graz, AustriaJean-Pierre Martens, Gent University, BelgiumBenjamin Schrauwen, Gent University, BelgiumWelf Wustlich, Planet intelligent Sytems GmbH, Schwerin, Germany
Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.