Sign for Notice Everyday    注册| 登陆| 友情链接| English|

Our Sponsors


    AROSA 2012 - 2nd Track on Adaptive and Reconfigurable Service-oriented and component-based Applications and Architectures

    View: 312

    Website www.wetice.org | Want to Edit it Edit Freely

    Category AROSA 2012

    Deadline: March 16, 2012 | Date: June 25, 2012-June 27, 2012

    Venue/Country: Toulouse, France

    Updated: 2012-01-17 22:01:31 (GMT+9)

    Call For Papers - CFP

    The goal of this track is to bring together researchers and practitioners both from the Academia and from the Industry working in the areas of Service-oriented and component-based software applications and architectures and addressing adaptation and reconfiguration issues. Different investigation topics are involved, such as: CBSE, SOA, Functional and Non Functional (NF) requirements (QoS, performance, resilience), monitoring, diagnosis, decision and execution of adaptation and reconfiguration. Different research axes are covered: concepts, methods, techniques, and tools to design, develop, deploy and manage adaptive and reconfigurable software systems.

    The development of composite services poses very interesting challenges concerning their functional and NF requirements. On the one hand, a composite software system depends on the NF requirements of its constituting components in order to provide a satisfactory service to the user. On the other hand, the main issues for the fulfillment of QoS and service level agreements (SLA) are concerned with performance variability. Indeed, the QoS may evolve frequently, either because of internal changes or because of workload fluctuations. The performance and the robustness of the composite software system may be significantly improved by monitoring the execution of the components and by flexibly reacting to degradation and anomalies in a timely fashion.

    The concept of adaptive and reconfigurable software systems has been introduced in order to describe architectures which exhibit such properties. An adaptive and reconfigurable software system can repair itself if any execution problems occur, in order to successfully complete its own execution, while respecting functional and NF agreements. In the design of an adaptive and reconfigurable software system, several aspects have to be considered. For instance, the system should be able to predict or to detect degradations and failures as soon as possible and to enact suitable recovery actions. Moreover, different NF requirements service levels might be considered in order to complete the execution in case of failure.

    TOPICS

    For this track, contributions are devoted to functional and non functional adaptability and reconfiguration management in service-oriented and component-based software systems. Specifically, the relevant topics include, but are not limited to:

    Distributed and centralized collaborative solutions for the diagnosis and repair of software systems

    Design for the diagnosability and repairability

    Collaborative Management of NF requirements (quality, security, robustness, availability)

    Monitoring simple and composite architectures, components and services

    Semantic (or analytic) architectural and behavioral models for monitoring of software systems

    Dynamic reconfiguration of CB and SO architectures

    Collaborative planning and decision making

    Collaborative technologies for ensuring autonomic properties

    Predictive management of adaptability.

    Collaborative Management of autonomic properties

    Experiences in practical adaptive and reconfigurable CB and SO applications

    Tools and prototypes for managing adaptability of CB and SO applications


    Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
    Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.