Sign for Notice Everyday    Sign Up| Sign In| Link| English|

Our Sponsors


    UNIW 2012 - The Uncertainty in Natural Intelligence Workshop

    View: 409

    Website | Want to Edit it Edit Freely

    Category UNIW 2012

    Deadline: July 01, 2012 | Date: August 18, 2012

    Venue/Country: Catalina Island, U.S.A

    Updated: 2012-05-01 23:22:23 (GMT+9)

    Call For Papers - CFP

    The Uncertainty in Natural Intelligence Workshop at UAI 2012

    http://cocosci.berkeley.edu/uai2012/

    Call for participation

    Workshop date: August 18, 2012

    Location: Catalina Island, CA, USA (near Los Angeles)

    Submission deadline: July 1, 2012 at 11:59pm PST

    Organizers:

    Noah Goodman (Stanford University)

    Thomas Griffiths (University of California, Berkeley)

    Josh Tenenbaum (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

    Joseph Austerweil (University of California, Berkeley)

    Invited speakers:

    Mark Steyvers (University of California, Irvine)

    Xiaojin (Jerry) Zhu (University of Wisconsin-Madison)

    Steve Piantadosi (University of Rochester)

    Keith Holyoak (University of California, Los Angeles)

    Workshop format:

    The full day workshop consists of talks from the invited speakers and organizers, poster

    spotlights (very brief talks), a session of contributed posters, and a discussion between

    the audience members, speakers, and organizers.

    Submission instructions:

    Please email 1 page abstracts to uaihumanlearning2012atgmail.com by July 1, 2012 at

    11:59pm PST. All abstracts will be reviewed by the organizing committee and notifications

    will be sent out by July 15, 2012.

    Important dates:

    Deadline for poster submissions: July 1, 2012 at 11:59pm PST

    Notification: July 15, 2012

    Workshop date: August 18, 2012

    Workshop description:

    Some of the hardest problems in artificial intelligence, such as feature and concept

    learning, are solved seemingly effortlessly by people. These are problems of inductive

    inference, which are difficult because there are many solutions that are consistent with

    the information explicitly given with the problem (e.g., solving ab=2 for the value of a

    without being given any additional information).

    People solve problems of inductive inference by favoring solutions that are consistent

    with their prior knowledge and penalizing solutions that are inconsistent with prior

    beliefs. Bayesian inference provides a formal calculus for how people should update their

    prior belief in each solution in light of their observations. Prior beliefs are

    formulated as a probability distribution over the unobserved solutions. This methodology

    has provided a successful paradigm for exploring formal solutions to how people solve

    inductive problems.

    Using Bayesian inference to formally represent human solutions to inductive problems not

    only provides a computational explanation of human behavior, but also offers novel

    methods for solving difficult problems in artificial intelligence. In this workshop, we

    present recent computational successes in human learning as a source of new artificial

    intelligence algorithms by exploiting the common computational language of these two

    communities, probability theory. This workshop is a forum for researchers in artificial

    intelligence, machine learning, and human learning, all interested in the same inductive

    problems, to discuss computational methodologies, insights, and research questions. We

    hope to foster a dialogue that leads to a greater understanding of human learning and

    further unites these two areas of research.


    Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
    Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.