Sign for Notice Everyday    Sign Up| Sign In| Link| English|

Our Sponsors


    FDA REGULATIONS REQUIRE A PREMARKET NOTIFICATION ( 2013 - Device Changes--The Critical Components of Analyzing and Documenting the Need or No Need for Additional 510(k) Clearance

    View: 308

    Website http://compliance2go.com/index.php | Want to Edit it Edit Freely

    Category Medical Device ; Pharma

    Deadline: April 15, 2013 | Date: April 16, 2013

    Venue/Country: Houstan, U.S.A

    Updated: 2013-02-09 00:30:12 (GMT+9)

    Call For Papers - CFP

    Why should you attend :

    FDA regulations require a premarket notification (510(k) submission when a medical device is significantly changed or modified in design, components, method of manufacturer, or intended use.FDA may view a significant change differently than a manufacturer, which could pose future risk of enforcement. This webinar will review necessary steps in determining whether a change in a device may be considered a “significant change” or not as well as the importance of documenting this process.

    Description of the topic :

    During this webinar, participants will be provided with an understanding of the procedures in analyzing whether additional 510(k) clearance is necessary for a product. We will review the types of modifications and necessary questions to ask to determine whether an additional 510(k) is necessary, including:

    1. Labeling changes

    2. Technology, engineering, and performance changes

    Materials changes

    Areas covered in the session

    Types of device chanfes that do and do not require additional 510(k) clearance

    Procedures for analyzing and documenting the need for additional 510(k) clearance.

    Who will benefit:

    Representatives of manufacturers and marketers of medical devices, including in-house counsel, outside counsel, regulatory affairs personnel, and regulatory consultants.

    Webinar Include:

    Certificate of Attendance

    Get a chance to be part of live Q/A Session with the Expert to ask your toughest question

    PDF print only copy of PowerPoint slides

    Attend 60 Minutes Live Presentation Online

    Faculty:

    J. Mason Weeda devotes his practice to a blend of regulatory and litigation matters, principally representing medical device, biologics, pharmaceutical and food manufacturers, distributors and importers.

    Mr. Weeda previously worked in various sales and marketing capacities for a biologics manufacturer and a laboratory that provided neurogenetic diagnostic testing. Mr. Weeda is a former law clerk to The Honorable Terrence J. McGann, of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland, where he was provided with vast exposure to numerous areas of litigation. Mr. Weeda then specialized in litigation at a boutique law firm in Maryland, where he handled domestic relations cases. This dynamic background of litigation skills and sales and marketing experience affords Mr. Weeda a unique and beneficial perspective in assessing and resolving regulatory matters.

    About Speaker

    Mr. Terman is a principal at OFW Law. He was born in Washington, DC, and received his B.S. in economics in 1973 from the University of Maryland where he was Phi Kappa Phi and his J.D. in 1976, also from the University of Maryland. Mr. Terman was admitted to the Maryland Bar in 1976 and the District of Columbia Bar in 1979. He is currently a member of the District of Columbia Bar.

    Speaker : Stephen D. Terman

    Product ID : F62206

    Schedule Date :

    Tuesday, April 16, 2013

    duration : 01:00 to 02:00 PM EST

    https://compliance2go.com/index.php?option=com_training&speakerkey=55&productKey=221


    Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
    Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.