Sign for Notice Everyday    注册| 登陆| 友情链接| English|

Our Sponsors


    Best Practices for Documenting a Computer System Validation Process

    View: 416

    Website http://www.onlinecompliancepanel.com/ecommerce/webinar/~product_id=500322?expDate=Ourglocal | Want to Edit it Edit Freely

    Category 508 compliance; act compliance; fda compliance; ada compliance; advisor compliance; argent software pci compliance; certificate of compliance; code compliance; compliance; compliance audit; compliance checklist; compliance issues; compliance jobs; compliance management; compliance manager; compliance manual; compliance monitoring; compliance monitoring ppt; compliance officer; compliance plan; compliance plans; compliance program; compliance software; compliance solutions; compliance testing; compliance training; compliance with; contract compliance; corporate compliance; email compliance; environmental compliance; export compliance; health care compliance; healthcare compliance; hipaa compliance; hippa compliance; investment advisor compliance; medical compliance; medication compliance; non compliance; osha compliance; osha compliance training; pci compliance; policy compliance; regulatory compliance; rohs compliance; safety compliance; sarbanes oxley compliance; security compliance; sox compliance; tax comp

    Deadline: June 19, 2014 | Date: June 19, 2014

    Venue/Country: 38868 Salmon Ter, Fremont, U.S.A

    Updated: 2014-05-07 18:14:43 (GMT+9)

    Call For Papers - CFP

    Instructor: Carolyn Troiano

    Description:

    We will discuss the importance of applying industry best practices when documenting the validation process for a computerized system used in an FDA-regulated environment (i.e., the system "touches" product during the manufacturing, testing or distribution process). Such a system must be validated in accordance with FDA guidelines for computerized systems and documented accordingly.

    This course will describe the best practices for documenting validation work, including "who" should be responsible for such tasks and "how" the documentation should be accomplished. FDA guidelines are very specific in terms of how this is to be done. In addition, we will touch on elements of electronic records and electronic signatures (ER/ES, or FDA 21 CFR Part 11). Specific criteria must be met in order to consider such a signature as valid in the eyes of FDA regulators.

    Computer system validation has been regulated by FDA for more than 30 years, as it relates to systems used in the manufacturing, testing and distribution of a product in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device or other FDA-regulated industries. The FDA requirements ensure thorough planning, implementation, integration, testing and management of computer systems used to collect, analyze and/or report data. Electronic records and electronic signatures (ER/ES) came into play through guidelines established by FDA in 1997, and disemminated through 21 CFR Part 11. This code describes the basic requirements for validating and documenting ER/ES capability in systems used in an FDA-regulated environment.

    Why Should you Attend:

    You should attend this seminar if you are responsible for planning, executing or managing the validation of a system governed by FDA regulations. This is true whether using a "wet" or ink-based signature, or an electronic signature. It is also true whether maintaining paper-based or electronic records. Different requirements pertain to each type of signature or record, and there is a specific set of best practices that need to be followed for either type.

    Effective and compliant computer system validation is critical to any pharmaceutical or FDA-regulated organization. During the past 30 years, best practices that have been developed will ensure that the cost of building and managing a computer system validation program will be minimized. There is an enormous body of documentation and information available that can be overwhelming. This course will provide a condensed overview of the practices that deliver the best results by directing the attendees to the most critical and cost-effective of methods, techniques and tools available for appropriate documentation of the validation process.

    Objectives of the Presentation:

    Upon completion of this session, attendees will have an understanding of computer system validation planning, execution and management concepts, in terms of how these efforts are to be adequately documented to meet FDA requirements. They will understand the steps required for documenting the validation process, along with the key documentation associated with maintaining the systems in a validated state, while minimizing costs. The attendees will have a good grasp of how to leverage these practices across all systems by creating a standardized program.

    Who can Benefit:

    This webinar will benefit any Consultants working in the Life Sciences Industry who are involved in Computer System Implementation, Validation and Compliance.

    Information Technology Analysts

    QC/QA Managers and Analysts

    Clinical Data Managers and Scientists

    Analytical Chemists

    Compliance Managers

    Lab Managers

    Automation Analysts

    Computer System Validation Specialists

    GMP Training Specialists

    Business Stakeholders and Individuals who are responsible for Computer System Validation Planning, Execution, Reporting, Compliance and Audit.

    Register Today

    http://www.onlinecompliancepanel.com/ecommerce/webinar/~product_id=500322?expDate=Ourglocal


    Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
    Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.