AUDIT TRAILS, COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR REGULATE 2016 - Review Electronic Data and Audit Trails - By Compliance Global Inc
View: 316
Website https://complianceglobal.us/product/700500/JoyMcElroy/review-electronic-data-and-audit-trails/1 |
Edit Freely
Category Education; E-Learning
Deadline: August 17, 2016 | Date: August 17, 2016
Venue/Country: online webinar, U.S.A
Updated: 2016-07-19 16:28:09 (GMT+9)
Call For Papers - CFP
Overview:The purpose of an Audit Trail for Electronic Record systems is to provide assurance of the integrity of the Electronic Health Records and the associated Raw Data.Although the FDA has stated that it intends to exercise enforcement discretion in relation to audit trail requirements in the 21 CFR Part 11 Guidance to Industry (2003) there have been a number of observations relating to the integrity of records and data since 2003 (see CSV FDA Warning Letters). These have been cited against 21 CFR 211.68.From the FDA Warning Letters relating to audit trails, it can be seen that it an audit trail is a regulatory expectation where data is stored and has the facility to be changed (modified or deleted). The audit trail requirements impact both computer controlled automated systems and laboratory systems used within the pharmaceutical manufacturing process.Why Should You Attend:This 90-minute webinar discusses the compliance requirements for regulated companies in relation to electronic medical record system, electronic patient record integrity and the use of Audit Trails for computer systems.Areas Covered in this Webinar:Audit TrailsCompliance requirements for regulated companiesRegulatory requirements (FDA, MNHA/EU Annex 11)Assuring record IntegritySystems with Audit TrailsSystems without Audit TrailsContent of an Audit TrailLearning Objectives:Learn what audit trails are and how they are establishedLearn compliance requirements for regulated companiesLearn regulatory requirements (FDA, MNHA/EU Annex 11)Learn how to assure record IntegrityLearn the benefits of systems with audit trailsLearn the how systems without Audit Trails may be incompliantWho Will Benefit:Senior Quality ManagersQuality ProfessionalsRegulatory ProfessionalsCompliance ProfessionalsValidation EngineersProduction EngineersQuality EngineersQuality AuditorsDocument Control SpecialistsFor more information, please visit : https://complianceglobal.us/product/700500/JoyMcElroy/review-electronic-data-and-audit-trails/1
Email: support
complianceglobal.us Toll Free: +1-844-746-4244Tel: +1-516-900-5515Level: IntermediateSpeaker Profile:Upon earning a degree in Zoology at North Carolina State University, Joy McElroy made her debut in the pharmaceutical industry in 1992 at Pharmacia & UpJohn performing environmental monitoring and sterility testing. Her hard work allowed her to move into a supervisory role at Abbott Laboratories where she oversaw their quality control lab. In 1998, Ms. McElroy moved to Wyeth Lederle and worked in quality assurance, performing GMP compliance audits, batch record reviews, and holding annual GMP training for new employees. After working in quality assurance for a few years, she moved into equipment qualification and cleaning validation at Mallinckrodt.With over 20 years of total experience in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries, Ms. McElroy has gained extensive knowledge of quality assurance, process and cleaning validation, equipment qualification, sterilization, and GMP compliance auditing. Her knowledge, experience, and strong work ethic have made her a highly sought-after engineer in both the pharmaceutical and biotech industries.In 2013, Ms. McElroy started her own company, Maynard Consulting Company, which provides top engineers, auditors, and validation specialist to pharmaceutical, biotech and medical device clients across the United States, Canada, and the world.
Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.