ARV 2011 - Third Biennial Alpine Rendez-Vous
View: 1390
Website |
Edit Freely
Category ARV 2011
Deadline: August 01, 2010 | Date: March 27, 2011-March 30, 2011
Venue/Country: La Clusaz, France
Updated: 2010-07-09 11:24:18 (GMT+9)
Call For Papers - CFP
1Alpine Rendez-vous Call for Workshop Proposals ? new deadline August 1st, 2010What is the Alpine Rendez-vous?The Alpine Rendez-Vous (ARV) is supported by the STELLAR Network of Excellence(www.stellarnet.eu) and aims at building a Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) researchercapacity on a European level. You do not have to be a STELLAR member to respond to this call.The ARV is an atypical, informal gathering, lasting three and a half days. The two previous ARVswere held in Villars (Switzerland) in 2007 and Garmisch-Partenkirchen (Germany) in 2009. TheARV is not a standard conference, but a set of independent workshops located at the same time inthe same hotel. Four workshops run in parallel during the first part of the week and four during thesecond part. It's called "Rendez-Vous" because shared events are organized in the middle of theweek (Tuesday evening) and because we set up breaks and meals in a way that promotes informalencounters between participants from the different workshops. Finally, it is called "Alpine" becauseit gathers scientists in the Alps, away from their workplace routines, in a place where snow is usedas “social facilitator."The international Reviewer Board of the Alpine Rendez-Vous gathers together members of the TELcommunity from all over the world and in particular European researchers who were activeparticipants of the former Networks of Excellence Kaleidoscope and Prolearn. The Reviewer Boardincludes both members of the present Network of Excellence STELLAR as well as researchersoutside of the network. The goal of STELLAR is to continue the community building processinitiated by Kaleidoscope and Prolearn. The ARV is also supported by the executive bodies ofTELEARC and EATEL, the associations stemming from the two former networks of excellence.Important datesWorkshop proposals (see below for requirements) should be sent by August 1st, 2010 to KristineLund and Pascale Pauly at ARV2011
ens-lyon.frAuthors of accepted workshop proposals will be notified by the last week in August, 2010.Workshop calls for participants should go out at the latest by September 15th.Potential participants should apply at the latest by October 1st.Workshop leaders will notify chosen participants and inform the Reviewer Board of theirorganization by October 15th.The ARV 2011 will be held March 27th to March 31stst, 2011Where?The third biennial ARV will take place in the French Alps in the Massif des Arravis at a beautifulski resort called La Clusaz (hotel Alpen Roc): http://www.laclusaz.com/hiverwinter10/
index.php?lang=_uk . There will be some free time in the afternoons for TEL communitybuilding during winter activities.2What should the workshop proposal include?Submissions, preferably in PDF format, should include the following items:1. Identification? Contact information of the workshop proposer including: name, affiliation, address,email, phone, fax and homepage URL (these last two optional);? Workshop title;? Expected number of participants.2. Description Abstract (2 pages)? Brief description of the workshop explaining the topic and the goals (especially as itrelates to one or more of the grand challenges ? see below);? Brief description of the general structure of the workshop, e.g., whether it will includepaper presentations, whether a call-for-papers will be issued or whether it will beinvitation-only;? A clear publishing strategy needs to be described: whether the contributions to theworkshop will be published in a book, a special issue for a journal, etc. Please indicatethe targeted journal(s) or book publisher;? Brief statement how this workshop will contribute to the integration of different TELresearch communities in Europe and beyond;3. Let us know if you could have any funding for your proposed workshop coming fromanother instrument within STELLAR or from any sources outside STELLAR (EU project,etc.).? Note, that there is a limited number of additional slots for workshops related to the topicbut funded by other grants. If you are interested in organizing such an externally fundedworkshop, please send a description of your plan.4. Plan for promoting the workshop and disseminating results (Website etc.)5. Plan for selecting workshop participants? One main goal of the Alpine Rendez-Vous is to bring together the different scientificcommunities doing research on Technology-Enhanced Learning.What are the criteria for choosing workshops?Between 6 and 8 workshops will be chosen by the Reviewer Board and the extent to which theworkshop proposer responds to the five points above will be evaluated. Each workshop proposalwill be sent to three reviewers (one internal to STELLAR and two external). A workshop wouldtypically include 20 participants. About half of them should be members of labs that belong toSTELLAR and will hence have their own funding to come. The second half should come fromoutside STELLAR (this is a requirement). The participation of 10 of these external participants (2or 3 nights + food) will be covered by the budget of the Alpine Rendez-Vous (10 people perworkshop regardless of workshop size), but they must cover their own travel expenses. Workshopsize can vary, depending on room distribution (5 rooms of 21m2 each, 1 room of 110 m2, 1 room of70 m2, 1 room of 35 m2).Workshops should encourage information sharing and discussion amongst groups of participants,rather than mere presentation of information by the organizers and presenters.In 2011, the JTEL Winterschool will be organized together with the ARV. The Winterschool is ahigh-level PhD school for the field of TEL in which interdisciplinary PhD candidates come togetherand present and discuss their advanced thesis work. Reflection will be carried out on thesis topics inrelation to ARV workshops and the grand challenges of STELLAR (see below). The selected PhDcandidates will be supported by STELLAR grants. Please direct any questions toMarcus.Specht
ou.nl3Workshops are required to make progress towards issues within at least one of the three ”GrandChallenges” in TEL research, shaped by STELLAR as:1) Connecting LearnersOn the Web, we can see that self-directed, self-managed and self-maintained communities createsuccessful new forms of collaboration. A wide range of tools is used by these communities forknowledge sharing and building, communication, collaboration and networking. Knowledgesharing and building is facilitated by open and closed forums, Wiki pages and personal or sharedblogs. Multimedia material is shared using popular tools such as FlickR and YouTube.Communication takes place using forums, annotation, tagging, chat rooms, instant messaging andvideo conferences. Collaboration is facilitated by shared media repositories, version managementsystems and collaborative text editing systems such as Google Docs. Networking portals, such asFaceBook and LinkedIn, allow professionals to find, contact and keep in touch with like-minded. Ina Web 2.0 world new communities bring together self-directed, self-managed and self- maintainedusers and, thereby, create successful new forms of collaboration. These new communities are opento all learners at any point in their life of learning. Within successful communities, inherentincentive mechanisms to motivate and encourage participation exist. The heart of learning andknowledge consists of people. Replacing the current centralized, static technology-push modelswith new interactive models that reflect the continuous, social nature of learning requires a radicalshift from a focus on knowing what to a focus on knowing how and knowing who. Within thistheme key research questions are: What are the characteristics of a network for learning? What arekey enabling and success factors for learner networks? What impact could web 2.0 technologieshave on learning in educational institutions? What impact could web 2.0 technologies have onlearning outside educational institutions? …. [excerpt from STELLAR-Del. 1.1]2) Orchestrating LearnersThe development of digital technologies, their interfaces and association with communicationtechnology, has opened up the possibility of accessing a large diversity of learning tools and allkinds of resources, as well as new infrastructures to support interactions and communicationsamong learners and teachers or trainers -- or in more general terms, among learners andknowledgeable others. This evolution is supported by the emergence of theoretical frameworkswhich provide new means to understand learning and to design more efficient and more relevantenvironments to support it. Situated cognition and situated learning theories, collaborative learning,exploratory learning as well as mobile learning theories are stimulating new approaches to learning,pedagogy, didactics and assessment. The multiplicity of the resources, the multiplicity of thedevices, the multiplicity of the agents (co-learners, teachers or trainers, artificial or human agents)contributing to a learning process is the modern mark of TEL. Its practical impact is therequirement for more and new collaborative competence for using, generating and exchangingknowledge in a peer-to-peer manner and participating in communities of learning. To face theemergence of this richer and more complex than ever world of learning resources, the newchallenge is to find methods and principles, as well as concepts and tools, to engineer learningsituations and/or learning environments. Within this theme key research questions include: What isthe role of the teacher/more knowledgeable other in orchestrating learning and how does this relateto collaboration and the knowledge of students? What is the role of assessment and evaluation inlearning and how can technology play a role? From the point of view of the learner what is therelationship between higher-order skills and learning of a particular knowledge domain and what isthe role of technology in this respect? How can we identify the current learning trajectory or aperson? Would it be beneficial to make them aware of trajectory switches? …. [excerpt fromSTELLAR-Del. 1.1]43) Contextualizing virtual learning environments and instrumentalising learning contextsAs learning has become an integrative part of our life, and as it takes place in different learnercommunities, so the tools, resources and systems that are used need to be contextualized. Thelearning context is the "setting", in a broad sense, in which the learning occurs (see discussionpage). It is continually created by people in interaction with others, with physical and digitalobjects, with their surroundings and with everyday tools. Complementarily, the interplay betweenformal and informal learning in formal and informal contexts has to be instrumentalized through theuse of physical artifacts, mobile devices and the configuration of physical and virtual space, in orderto create learning opportunities beyond the traditional institutional boundaries. Technologies forlearning must be designed for culturally mediated settings, which include the co-design oftechnology and pedagogy for situated learning, simulated environments and support for mobility.Traditional classroom learning is founded on an illusion of context stability, by setting up a fixedlocation with common resources, a single teacher, and an agreed curriculum, which allows asemblance of common ground. But if these are removed, a fundamental challenge is how to formislands of temporarily stable context to enable meaning making from the flow of everyday activity.Within this theme key research questions include: How can new forms of technology-enhancedlearning enable novel experiences for learners and for development of human competences andcapabilities? How can the mobility of the learner in distributed and multi environment learningsettings be supported, to include the transition between a) real and virtual contexts b) informal andformal learning contexts? Which standards are needed to achieve interoperability and reusability oflearning resources in this field? How can we harmonize the existing learning standards? … [excerptfrom STELLAR-Del. 1.1]What else do we ask of workshop organizers?After the event, workshop organizers will be responsible for writing or editing a white paper (8pages) briefly summarizing the event and how it contributed to one of the Grand Challenges ofSTELLAR. Wherever applicable, the workshop contributions should be published in a journalspecial issue or book. Workshop organizers should create and maintain a group on teleurope.eu tocommunicate their topics with stakeholders. The white paper could include an outline of the specialissue or book proposal. The white paper will be due May 20th, 2011 and instructions for writing itwill be communicated at a later date.We look forward to your Alpine Rendez-Vous 2011 workshop proposals!
Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.