Sign for Notice Everyday    注册| 登陆| 友情链接| English|

Our Sponsors


    PHARMACEUTICALS 2011 - How to transfer QC procedures for commercial products in pharma industry - ICH and USP guidelines - Pharmaceuticals webinar By ComplianceOnline

    View: 1112

    Website http://complianceonline.com/ecommerce/control/trainingFocus/~product_id=701845?channel=ourglocal | Want to Edit it Edit Freely

    Category Pharmaceuticals,conference,event,Webinar

    Deadline: February 03, 2011 | Date: February 03, 2011

    Venue/Country: Palo Alto, U.S.A

    Updated: 2010-12-03 20:08:28 (GMT+9)

    Call For Papers - CFP

    Why Should You Attend:

    Once a product goes commercial, measuring the quality, safety, and efficacy attributes of the drug substance and the drug product is crucial. There are well-established ICH guidelines for the validation requirements of typical analytical procedures. In contrast, the requirements for a technical transfer of an analytical procedure from one site to another or within a site to a separate facility are often debated.

    It is critical that a robust transfer program be put into place in order to head off issues. Unearthing issues at the drug development stage, rather than during routine manufacture, will improve the overall success of the project. Attend this webinar to understand the ICH and USP guidance for validation, and how to apply ICH guidelines for method transfer and how to establish boundaries.

    Areas Covered in the Seminar:

    ICH guidelines for validation.

    USP guidelines for validation and verification.

    Applications of the ICH guidelines for method transfer.

    Debated topics and approaches.

    Complex procedures.

    Establishing boundaries.


    Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
    Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.