Sign for Notice Everyday    注册| 登陆| 友情链接| English|

Our Sponsors


    TEXT-TO-TEXT 2011 - Workshop on Monolingual Text-To-Text Generation

    View: 789

    Website acl2011.org | Want to Edit it Edit Freely

    Category TEXT-TO-TEXT 2011

    Deadline: April 01, 2011 | Date: June 24, 2011

    Venue/Country: Oregon, U.S.A

    Updated: 2011-01-31 23:23:51 (GMT+9)

    Call For Papers - CFP

    Workshop on Monolingual

    Text-To-Text Generation

    Co-located with ACL-HLT 2011 in Portland, OR, 24 June 2011

    Call for papers

    The ability to perform monolingual text-to-text generation is an important step in solving many natural language processing problems. For example, when generating novel text at the sentence-level, abstractive summarization systems may need to compress sentences or fuse multiple sentences together; the evaluation of translation systems may require additional paraphrases to use as reference gold standards; and answers to questions may need to be generated automatically from extracted sentences.

    The community of researchers examining monolingual text-to-text generation has grown steadily in recent years, introducing the need for a focused venue to communicate results in this area. As tools and approaches are developed, it is important that our community shares its experiences and its resources.

    This workshop will solicit work describing the use of data-oriented text-to-text generation methods, where the generation process begins with some source text as input. As such, it complements existing events such as GenChal'11 at ENLG 2011, which will have a focus on data-to-text surface realisation methods.

    This year, the workshop will focus on work describing the generation of novel sentences, with preference given to submissions that describe how the proposed text-to-text generation model has an impact on content selection and/or issues of grammaticality at the sentence level. Submissions can describe work-in-progress, resources, position papers as well as traditional unpublished work.

    Suggested topics for this workshop include (but are not limited to):

    Sentence fusion

    Sentence compression

    Sentence-level paraphrase generation

    Answer generation for questions

    Sentence simplification

    Evaluating novel sentence generation

    Semantics and world knowledge for sentence generation

    Content planning issues in text-to-text generation

    Incorporating user preferences for text-to-text generation

    Discourse-level constraints for novel sentence generation

    Descriptions of new monolingual text-to-text generation problems

    Applications of monolingual text-to-text generation

    List of useful resources.

    Submit a paper

    TBA

    Important dates

    Dec 18 Workshop CFP

    Apr 01 Paper due date

    Apr 25 Notification of acceptance

    May 06 Camera-ready deadline

    Jun 24 Workshop

    Program & steering committee

    Anja Belz

    Bernd Bohnet

    Aoife Cahill

    Chris Callison-Burch

    Robert Dale

    Mark Dras

    Michel Galley

    Kevin Knight

    Emiel Krahmer

    Mirella Lapata

    Nitin Madnani

    Erwin Marsi

    Ryan McDonald

    Cécile Paris

    Michael Strube

    Michael White

    David Zajic

    Steering committee:

    Chris Callison-Burch

    Mirella Lapata

    Erwin Marsi

    Organizers & contact information

    Katja Filippova (katjaf at google dot com)

    Stephen Wan (first name dot last name at csiro dot au)

    Useful resources

    Links to compression and paraphrase corpora in English.

    Paraphrase resources (English).

    Microsoft paraphrase corpus.

    Paraphrase data sets (English).

    Dutch fusion data.

    A German comparable corpus of biographies.

    Sets of related sentences from reviews (English).

    Parallel monolingual treebank for Dutch.


    Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
    Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.