FOOD SAFETY 2011 - Understanding and Implementing FDA’S 21 CFR Part 11
View: 577
Website http://complianceonline.com/ecommerce/control/trainingFocus/~product_id=701867?channel=ourglocal |
Edit Freely
Category Food Safety,conference,event,Webinar
Deadline: February 08, 2011 | Date: February 08, 2011
Venue/Country: Palo Alto, U.S.A
Updated: 2011-02-02 15:13:09 (GMT+9)
Call For Papers - CFP
Why Should You Attend:In 1997 the US FDA issued a regulation that provides criteria for acceptance by the FDA of electronic records, electronic signatures and handwritten signatures. The rule applies to all industry segments regulated by the FDA that includes Good Laboratory Practice (GLP), Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP). Even the rule is more than 10 years old there still many questions related to the scope and real requirements of Part 11.Attend this 21 cfr part 11 webinar to get a good understanding of current and future FDA requirements and provide steps, examples and tools for cost-effective implementation.Areas Covered in the Seminar:Overview on Part 11 history and requirementsCurrent and future FDA inspections with focus on computers and electronic recordsPart 11 requirements that are NOT enforced any moreGoing through individual requirements:Validationlimited authorized access to system and dataarchiving and retrieval of e-recordsexecuting electronic signaturesbinding signatures with records, trainingRecommendations for implementation and documentationBringing existing systems into compliance with minimal effortResponsibilities of vendors and usersGoing through most common pitfallsGoing through frequently asked questions and answersPreparing for Part 11 InspectionsNOTE: Use This Promocode ( 117660 ) To Get 10% Discount.
Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.