Sign for Notice Everyday    注册| 登陆| 友情链接| English|

Our Sponsors


    MEDICAL DEVICES 2011 - Risk-Based Verification and Validation Planning to Meet U.S. FDA, ICH Q9 and ISO 14971

    View: 995

    Website http://complianceonline.com/ecommerce/control/trainingFocus/~product_id=701888?channel=ourglocal | Want to Edit it Edit Freely

    Category Medical Devices,conference,event,Webinar

    Deadline: March 31, 2011 | Date: March 31, 2011

    Venue/Country: Palo Alto, U.S.A

    Updated: 2011-02-02 18:03:34 (GMT+9)

    Call For Papers - CFP

    Why Should You Attend:

    FDA Warning Letters and recent high-profile recalls indicate major cGMP deficiencies in many companies. One major failing is lack of sufficient or targeted risk-based V&V planning. Why do companies need a Master Validation Plan? What are the must have elements from ISO 14971 and ICH Q9 for hazard analysis and product risk management? How can these be integrated into a company's quality management system.

    Attend this Webinar to know how to review a company's Master Validation Plan for major cGMP deficiencies. How to address the FDA's newer and tougher regulatory stance. How to create a Master Validation Plan, evaluating its elements against ISO 14971 and ICH Q9 for hazard analysis and product risk management and develop meaningful product and process validations. Also the roles of different V&V protocols; how to employ equipment / process DQs, IQs, OQs, and PQs, against a background of limited company resources. A matrix simplifies "as-product", in-product", process and equipment, et al, software VT&V, assuring key FDA requirements are not overlooked. The QMS and 21 CFR Part 11 will be discussed.

    NOTE: Use This Promocode ( 117660 ) To Get 10% Discount.


    Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
    Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.