Our Sponsors
Category QEST 2011
Deadline: March 25, 2011 | Date: September 05, 2011-September 08, 2011
Venue/Country: Aachen, Germany
Updated: 2011-02-11 12:57:07 (GMT+9)
Co-located with CONCUR '11,the 22nd International Conference on Concurrency Theory, and TGC '11, the 6th International Symposium on Trustworthy Global Computing.In cooperation with ACM SIGMETRICS.DeadlinesScope and TopicsEvaluation of PapersSubmissionsTool presentationsInvited SpeakersChairs and CommitteesDeadlinesAbstract submission: 18 March, 2011Paper and tool submission: 25 March, 2011Author notification: 16 May, 2011Camera ready version: 6 June, 2011^ topScope and TopicsQEST is the leading forum on evaluation and verification of computer systems and networks, through stochastic models and measurements. QEST has a broad range of interest - the common thread is that the evaluation be quantitative. The range of performance metrics of interest spans classical measures involving performance and reliability, as well as quantification of properties that are classically qualitative, such as safety, correctness, and security. QEST welcomes measurement-based studies as well as analytic studies. QEST welcomes diversity in the model formalisms and methodologies employed, as well as development of new formalisms and methodologies. QEST is keenly interested in case studies highlighting the role of quantitative evaluation in the design of systems, where the notion of system is broad. Systems of interest include computer hardware and software architectures, communication systems, embed systems and biological systems. Moreover, tools for supporting the practical application of research results in all of the above areas are of special interest, and therefore tool papers are sought. In short, QEST aims to create a sound methodological basis for assessing and designing systems using quantitative means.^ topEvaluation of PapersAll submitted papers will be thoroughly judged by at least three reviewers on the basis of their originality, technical quality, scientific or practical contribution to the state of the art, methodology, clarity, and adequacy of references. QEST considers five types of papers with additional reviewing criteria (in no particular order):Theoretical: advance our understanding, apply to non-trivial problems and be mathematically rigorous.Methodological and technical: describe situations that require the development and proposal of new analysis processes and techniques. Process structure and the individual steps should be clearly described. If the methodology has already been evaluated with applications, a brief description of the lessons learned would be very helpful.Application: describes a novel application, and compares with previous results (if any).Tools: should motivate the development of the new tools and the formalisms they support. Tool papers need neither discuss their theoretical underpinnings nor their algorithms. Instead, they should focus on the software architecture and discuss its practical capabilities with particular reference to the size and type of model it can handle within reasonable time and space limits.Tool demonstration: describe a relevant tool, as well as its features, evaluation, or any other information that may demonstrate the merits of the tool.^ topSubmissionsWe invite submissions of original papers related to the aforementioned topics. Submissions must be in English, IEEE double-column format, and must indicate the above paper type. Submission instructions can be found at www.qest.org. Submitted papers should not exceed 10 pages (2 pages for tool demonstrations). Additional material for the aid of the reviewers (e.g., proofs) can be sent in a clearly marked appendix. Papers must be unpublished and not be submitted for publication elsewhere. PC members, except program co-chairs, may submit papers.All accepted papers (including tool demonstrations) will appear in the Conference Proceedings published by the Conference Publishing Services (CPS), and must be presented at the conference by one of the authors. A best-paper award will be presented at the conference.It is planned that selected papers will appear in a special issue of an international journal.^ topTool presentationsTool presentation sessions will be arranged to present and demonstrate tools relevant to conference topics. Accepted tool descriptions will appear in the conference proceedings.^ topInvited SpeakersParosh Abdulla, Uppsala University, SwedenGeoffrey Smith, Florida International University, USALothar Thiele, ETH Zurich, Switzerland^ topChairs and CommitteesGeneral ChairJoost-Pieter Katoen (DE)Program Co-chairsCatuscia Palamidessi (F)Alma Riska (US)Tools ChairAnne Remke (NL)Tutorials ChairGethin Norman (UK)Local Organization ChairThomas Noll (DE)Publicity ChairVerena Wolf (DE)Fast Abstract ChairBenny van Houdt (B)Steering CommitteeGianfranco Ciardo (US)Pedro D'Argenio(AR)Susanna Donatelli (Italy)Boudewijn Haverkort (NL, chair)Jane Hillston (UK)Joost-Pieter Katoen (DE)Andrew Miner (US)Gerardo Rubino (F)William Sanders (US)Evgenia Smirni (US)Miklos Telek (HU)Program CommitteeChristel Baier (DE)Henrik Bohnenkamp (DE)Giuliano Casale (UK)Ludmilla Cherkasova (US)Gianfranco Ciardo (US)Pedro D'Argenio (AR)Vittoria de Nitto Personè (IT)Yuxin Deng (CN)Marie Duflot (F)Giuliana Franceschinis (IT)Holger Hermanns (DE)Jane Hillston (UK)Radha Jagadeesan (US)Kaustubh Joshi (US)Antonin Kucera (CZ)Rakesh Kumar (US)Boris Köpf (E)Cosimo Laneve (IT)Axel Legay (F)Annabelle McIver (AUS)Daniel Menasce (US)Ningfang Mi (US)Andrew Miner (US)Uwe Nestmann (DE)Gethin Norman (UK)Takayuki Osogami (JP)David Parker (UK)Anne Remke (NL)Alexandra Silva (NL)Evgenia Smirni (US)Jeremy Sproston (IT)Miklos Telek (HU)Aad van Moorsel (UK)Enrico Vicario (IT)Katinka Wolter (DE)Wang Yi (S)Lijun Zhang (DK)Li Zhang (US)Keywords: Accepted papers list. Acceptance Rate. EI Compendex. Engineering Index. ISTP index. ISI index. Impact Factor.
Disclaimer: ourGlocal is an open academical resource system, which anyone can edit or update. Usually, journal information updated by us, journal managers or others. So the information is old or wrong now. Specially, impact factor is changing every year. Even it was correct when updated, it may have been changed now. So please go to Thomson Reuters to confirm latest value about Journal impact factor.